Mesulam Marsel, Wicklund Alissa, Johnson Nancy, Rogalski Emily, Léger Gabriel C, Rademaker Alfred, Weintraub Sandra, Bigio Eileen H
Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Ann Neurol. 2008 Jun;63(6):709-19. doi: 10.1002/ana.21388.
To identify predictors of Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology in primary progressive aphasia (PPA), and determine whether the AD pathology is atypically distributed to fit the aphasic phenotype.
Neuropsychological and neuropathological analyses of 23 consecutive PPA autopsies. All had qualitative determination of neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) density. Additional quantitation was done in four of the PPA/AD cases and four AD cases with the typical amnestic dementia of the Alzheimer type.
The sample contained mostly logopenic, agrammatic, and mixed forms of PPA. All six agrammatics had frontotemporal lobar degeneration (five of six with tauopathy). Seven of the 11 logopenics had AD. In logopenics, lower memory scores increased the probability of AD, but there were exceptions. The PPA/AD group showed predominance of entorhinal NFT typical of the amnestic dementia of the Alzheimer type. In the small subgroup examined quantitatively, neocortical NFTs were more numerous in the left hemisphere of PPA/AD. However, the asymmetry was low and inconsistent. Neuritic plaques did not display consistent asymmetry. Apolipoprotein E4, a major risk factor for typical AD, did not predict AD pathology in PPA.
Subtyping PPA helps to predict AD versus frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology at the group level. However, our results and the literature also indicate that no clinical predictor is completely reliable in individual patients. The inconsistent concordance of NFT distribution with the asymmetric atrophy and the nonamnestic phenotype also raises the possibility that the AD markers encountered at autopsy in PPA may not always reflect the nature of the initiating neurodegenerative process.
识别原发性进行性失语(PPA)中阿尔茨海默病(AD)与额颞叶变性病理的预测因素,并确定AD病理是否呈非典型分布以符合失语表型。
对23例连续的PPA尸检进行神经心理学和神经病理学分析。所有病例均对神经原纤维缠结(NFT)密度进行了定性测定。对4例PPA/AD病例和4例典型阿尔茨海默型遗忘性痴呆的AD病例进行了额外的定量分析。
样本主要包含语音性失语、语法性失语和混合型PPA。所有6例语法性失语患者均有额颞叶变性(6例中有5例为tau蛋白病)。11例语音性失语患者中有7例患有AD。在语音性失语患者中,较低的记忆分数增加了患AD的可能性,但也有例外。PPA/AD组显示出典型阿尔茨海默型遗忘性痴呆的内嗅区NFT占优势。在进行定量检查的小亚组中,PPA/AD患者左半球的新皮质NFT更多。然而,这种不对称性较低且不一致。神经炎性斑块未表现出一致的不对称性。载脂蛋白E4是典型AD的主要危险因素,但不能预测PPA中的AD病理。
对PPA进行亚型分类有助于在群体水平上预测AD与额颞叶变性病理。然而,我们的结果和文献也表明,在个体患者中没有临床预测指标是完全可靠的。NFT分布与不对称萎缩和非遗忘性表型的不一致性也增加了在PPA尸检中遇到的AD标志物可能并不总是反映起始神经退行性过程本质的可能性。