Raynes-Greenow Camille H, Nassar Natasha, Roberts Christine L
Perinatal Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Apr;32(2):131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00188.x.
To quantify the residential mobility rate in a population of pregnant women expecting their first baby.
We verified residential mobility in a cohort of 585 primiparous Australian women who were enrolled in late pregnancy and had participated in a randomised controlled trial and followed-up to at least 16 weeks post-partum.
We found a residential mobility rate of 19%. Movers and non-movers differed by socio-demographic factors, with movers more likely be younger, relative risk (RR)=2.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.13), and not living with a partner RR=2.46 (95% CI 1.60-3.77).
Most prospective epidemiological studies can expect some attrition in the study population. The family formation period is acknowledged as a highly mobile time and this mobility may contribute to loss to follow-up.
Researchers planning prospective studies in pregnant populations should consider the impact of residential mobility, especially differential mobility, and implement strategies to reduce attrition and optimise response rates.
量化首次怀孕的孕妇群体中的居住流动性率。
我们在一组585名澳大利亚初产妇中核实了居住流动性情况,这些产妇在妊娠晚期入组,参与了一项随机对照试验,并随访至产后至少16周。
我们发现居住流动性率为19%。流动者和非流动者在社会人口学因素方面存在差异,流动者更可能较年轻,相对风险(RR)=2.14(95%置信区间(CI)1.41 - 3.13),且不与伴侣同住RR = 2.46(95%CI 1.60 - 3.77)。
大多数前瞻性流行病学研究预计研究人群会有一定程度的损耗。家庭形成期被认为是流动性很高的时期,这种流动性可能导致失访。
计划对孕妇群体进行前瞻性研究的研究者应考虑居住流动性的影响,尤其是差异流动性,并实施策略以减少损耗并优化应答率。