Suppr超能文献

初产妇队列在孕期和产后的居住流动性。

Residential mobility in a cohort of primiparous women during pregnancy and post-partum.

作者信息

Raynes-Greenow Camille H, Nassar Natasha, Roberts Christine L

机构信息

Perinatal Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Apr;32(2):131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00188.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the residential mobility rate in a population of pregnant women expecting their first baby.

METHOD

We verified residential mobility in a cohort of 585 primiparous Australian women who were enrolled in late pregnancy and had participated in a randomised controlled trial and followed-up to at least 16 weeks post-partum.

RESULTS

We found a residential mobility rate of 19%. Movers and non-movers differed by socio-demographic factors, with movers more likely be younger, relative risk (RR)=2.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.13), and not living with a partner RR=2.46 (95% CI 1.60-3.77).

CONCLUSION

Most prospective epidemiological studies can expect some attrition in the study population. The family formation period is acknowledged as a highly mobile time and this mobility may contribute to loss to follow-up.

IMPLICATIONS

Researchers planning prospective studies in pregnant populations should consider the impact of residential mobility, especially differential mobility, and implement strategies to reduce attrition and optimise response rates.

摘要

目的

量化首次怀孕的孕妇群体中的居住流动性率。

方法

我们在一组585名澳大利亚初产妇中核实了居住流动性情况,这些产妇在妊娠晚期入组,参与了一项随机对照试验,并随访至产后至少16周。

结果

我们发现居住流动性率为19%。流动者和非流动者在社会人口学因素方面存在差异,流动者更可能较年轻,相对风险(RR)=2.14(95%置信区间(CI)1.41 - 3.13),且不与伴侣同住RR = 2.46(95%CI 1.60 - 3.77)。

结论

大多数前瞻性流行病学研究预计研究人群会有一定程度的损耗。家庭形成期被认为是流动性很高的时期,这种流动性可能导致失访。

启示

计划对孕妇群体进行前瞻性研究的研究者应考虑居住流动性的影响,尤其是差异流动性,并实施策略以减少损耗并优化应答率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验