Staehle H J
Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltungskunde der Universität, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, W-6900, Heidelberg.
Schmerz. 1993 Jun;7(2):68-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02527863.
Amalgam, which has long been used as a restorative material, has recently become the target of more and more criticism. An assessment of amalgam requires consideration of different aspects of toxicology, allergology, electrochemistry, psychology, and dentistry. Up to now, there is no scientific evidence that the physical properties of amalgam can lead to pain. Amalgam fillings with insufficiently formed chewing surfaces can cause myofacial pain, but the same can be said of restorations performed with any other material. Almost all preventive or therapeutic dental treatment can have adverse effects, and an attempt to eliminate all risks could well eliminate established methods in dentistry as well. This paper presents the ramifications of an amalgam ban, which is being called for by various groups, in some detail.
汞合金长期以来一直被用作修复材料,但最近却越来越受到批评。对汞合金的评估需要考虑毒理学、过敏学、电化学、心理学和牙科学等不同方面。到目前为止,尚无科学证据表明汞合金的物理性质会导致疼痛。咀嚼面形成不足的汞合金填充物可能会导致肌筋膜疼痛,但使用任何其他材料进行的修复也可能出现这种情况。几乎所有预防性或治疗性牙科治疗都可能产生不良影响,而试图消除所有风险很可能也会消除牙科领域已有的方法。本文详细介绍了一些团体所呼吁的汞合金禁令的影响。