Suppr超能文献

饶了我吧!非正式照料者对临时护理的态度。

Give me a break! Informal caregiver attitudes towards respite care.

作者信息

van Exel Job, de Graaf Gjalt, Brouwer Werner

机构信息

Erasmus MC, Department of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2008 Oct;88(1):73-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Because informal health care is now recognized to be indispensable to health care systems, different forms of respite care have been developed and publicly funded that supposedly alleviate caregivers' perceived burdens and help prolong the care giving task. Nonetheless, the use of respite care services is low even among substantially strained caregivers. To throw light on this low usage, this paper explores the associations between attitudes towards respite care, characteristics of the care giving situation, and the need and use of respite care.

METHOD

The survey, administered to a sample of 273 informal caregivers, addressed caregiver, care recipient, and care giving situation characteristics, as well as the familiarity and use of respite care services. It also included a sub-set of 12 statements eliciting attitudes towards respite care from an earlier study [Van Exel NJA, De Graaf G, Brouwer WBF. Care for a break? An investigation of informal caregivers' attitudes toward respite care using Q-methodology. Health Policy 2007;83(2/3):332-42]. Associations between variables were measured using univariate statistics and multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

We found three caregiver attitudes, distributed fairly equally in the sample, that are apparently associated with caregiver educational level, employment status, health and happiness, as well as care recipient gender, duration and intensity of care giving, relationship, co-residence, need for surveillance, and subjective burden and process utility of care giving. However, the relation between attitude and familiarity with and use of respite care services is ambiguous.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further exploration is needed of the mix of Q-methodology and survey analysis, the overall results indicate that a considerable portion of the caregiver population needs but does not readily ask for support or respite care. This finding has important policy implications in the context of an ageing population.

摘要

背景/目的:由于非正规医疗保健现已被认为是医疗保健系统不可或缺的一部分,因此已经开发并由公共资金资助了不同形式的临时护理,据称这些护理可以减轻照顾者所感受到的负担,并有助于延长护理任务的时间。尽管如此,即使在负担极大的照顾者中,临时护理服务的使用率也很低。为了阐明这种低使用率的原因,本文探讨了对临时护理的态度、护理情况的特征以及对临时护理的需求和使用之间的关联。

方法

该调查针对273名非正规照顾者样本进行,涉及照顾者、受照顾者和护理情况的特征,以及对临时护理服务的熟悉程度和使用情况。它还包括从早期研究中选取的一组12条陈述,用于引出对临时护理的态度[Van Exel NJA, De Graaf G, Brouwer WBF。休息一下的护理?使用Q方法对非正规照顾者对临时护理态度的调查。《卫生政策》2007年;83(2/3):332 - 42]。变量之间的关联使用单变量统计和多项逻辑回归进行测量。

结果

我们发现了三种照顾者态度,在样本中分布相当均匀,这些态度显然与照顾者的教育水平、就业状况、健康和幸福感,以及受照顾者的性别、护理时间和强度、关系、共同居住情况、监督需求以及护理的主观负担和过程效用相关。然而,态度与对临时护理服务的熟悉程度和使用之间的关系并不明确。

结论

尽管需要进一步探索Q方法和调查分析的结合,但总体结果表明,相当一部分照顾者群体需要但并不容易寻求支持或临时护理。这一发现在人口老龄化的背景下具有重要的政策意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验