Kasai A, Yamakado T, Masuda T, Aoki T, Futagami Y, Hamada M, Nakano T
First Department of Internal Medicine, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu.
J Cardiol. 1991;21(2):215-20.
To assess the difference between cardiovascular responses to treadmill exercise (TM) and those to bicycle ergometer exercise (EM) in provoking coronary spasm, we compared the ST segment shifts (elevation or depression) during TM and EM in 67 patients with vasospastic angina. Coronary artery spasm was demonstrated on angiography. Both TM and EM were performed on the same day during a medication-free period. For both tests, multistage, symptom-limited exercise protocols were used; EM in the morning and TM in the afternoon. The results obtained were as follows: 1. Rate-pressure products at peak exercise during TM and EM were similar. Systolic blood pressure levels at peak exercise were higher during EM than during TM (p < 0.01). The patients' heart rates at peak exercise were higher during TM than during EM (p < 0.01). Diastolic blood pressure levels at peak exercise were higher during EM than during TM (p < 0.05). 2. Exercise-induced ST elevation occurred more frequently with TM than with EM (19% vs 9%, p < 0.05). 3. Exercise-induced ST depression was provided in 27 patients during TM and in 13 during EM (40% vs 19%, p < 0.01). Among 45 patients without significant lesions, ST depression occurred in 19 during TM, but in only 7 during EM (42% vs 16%, p < 0.01). In conclusion, coronary spasm seemed to occur more frequently with TM than with EM. The mechanism causing such difference remains to be elucidated, however, we speculate that the difference between TM and EM as to enhanced autonomous nervous system activity and coronary perfusion exercise may be related to the difference in the incidence of coronary spasm.
为评估在诱发冠状动脉痉挛方面,跑步机运动(TM)和自行车测力计运动(EM)所引起的心血管反应之间的差异,我们比较了67例血管痉挛性心绞痛患者在TM和EM期间的ST段偏移(抬高或压低)情况。冠状动脉痉挛通过血管造影得以证实。TM和EM均在同一天的无药期进行。对于这两项测试,均采用多阶段、症状限制运动方案;上午进行EM,下午进行TM。获得的结果如下:1. TM和EM期间运动峰值时的心率血压乘积相似。EM期间运动峰值时的收缩压水平高于TM期间(p < 0.01)。TM期间运动峰值时患者的心率高于EM期间(p < 0.01)。EM期间运动峰值时的舒张压水平高于TM期间(p < 0.05)。2. TM比EM更频繁地诱发运动性ST段抬高(19%对9%,p < 0.05)。3. 27例患者在TM期间出现运动性ST段压低,13例在EM期间出现(40%对19%,p < 0.01)。在45例无显著病变的患者中,19例在TM期间出现ST段压低,但仅7例在EM期间出现(42%对16%,p < 0.01)。总之,冠状动脉痉挛似乎在TM时比在EM时更频繁发生。然而,导致这种差异的机制仍有待阐明,我们推测TM和EM在增强自主神经系统活动和冠状动脉灌注运动方面的差异可能与冠状动脉痉挛发生率的差异有关。