Kawai Masataka, Halvorson Herbert R
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52245, USA.
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2007;28(7-8):371-95. doi: 10.1007/s10974-008-9131-3. Epub 2008 Apr 19.
Two- and three-state cross-bridge models are considered and examined with respect to their ability to predict three distinct phases of the force transients that occur in response to step change in muscle fiber length. Particular attention is paid to satisfying the Le Châtelier-Brown Principle. This analysis shows that the two-state model can account for phases 1 and 2 of a force transient, but is barely adequate to account for phase 3 (delayed force) unless a stretch results in a sudden increase in the number of cross-bridges in the detached state. The three-state model (A-->B-->C-->A) makes it possible to account for all three phases if we assume that the A-->B transition is fast (corresponding to phase 2), the B-->A transition is of intermediate speed (corresponding to phase 3), and the C-->A transition is slow; in such a scenario, states A and C can support or generate force (high force states) but state B cannot (detached, or low-force state). This model involves at least one ratchet mechanism. In this model, force can be generated by either of two transitions: B-->A or B-->C. To determine which of these is the major force-generating step that consumes ATP and transduces energy, we examine the effects of ATP, ADP, and phosphate (Pi) on force transients. In doing so, we demonstrate that the fast transition (phase 2) is associated with the nucleotide-binding step, and that the intermediate-speed transition (phase 3) is associated with the Pi-release step. To account for all the effects of ligands, it is necessary to expand the three-state model into a six-state model that includes three ligand-bound states. The slowest phase of a force transient (phase 4) cannot be explained by any of the models described unless an additional mechanism is introduced. Here we suggest a role of series compliance to account for this phase, and propose a model that correlates the slowest step of the cross-bridge cycle (transition C-->A) to: phase 4 of step analysis, the rate constant k(tr) of the quick-release and restretch experiment, and the rate constant k(act) for force development time course following Ca(2+) activation.
研究并检验了二态和三态横桥模型预测肌肉纤维长度阶跃变化时力瞬变三个不同阶段的能力。特别关注满足勒夏特列 - 布朗原理。该分析表明,二态模型可以解释力瞬变的第1阶段和第2阶段,但除非拉伸导致分离状态下横桥数量突然增加,否则几乎不足以解释第3阶段(延迟力)。三态模型(A→B→C→A)如果我们假设A→B转变很快(对应于第2阶段),B→A转变速度中等(对应于第3阶段),C→A转变很慢,就有可能解释所有三个阶段;在这种情况下,状态A和C可以支持或产生力(高力状态),但状态B不能(分离或低力状态)。该模型涉及至少一种棘轮机制。在这个模型中,力可以由两个转变中的任何一个产生:B→A或B→C。为了确定这些转变中哪一个是消耗ATP并转换能量的主要力产生步骤,我们研究了ATP、ADP和磷酸盐(Pi)对力瞬变的影响。通过这样做,我们证明快速转变(第2阶段)与核苷酸结合步骤相关,中等速度转变(第3阶段)与Pi释放步骤相关。为了解释配体的所有影响,有必要将三态模型扩展为包括三个配体结合状态的六态模型。力瞬变的最慢阶段(第4阶段)除非引入额外机制,否则无法用上述任何模型解释。在这里,我们提出串联弹性的作用来解释这个阶段,并提出一个模型,将横桥循环的最慢步骤(转变C→A)与:阶跃分析的第4阶段、快速释放和再拉伸实验的速率常数k(tr)以及Ca(2+)激活后力发展时间过程的速率常数k(act)相关联。