Haynes R B, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald H P, Yao X
McMaster University, Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, 1200 Main Street West, Rm. 2C10B, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub3.
People who are prescribed self-administered medications typically take less than half the prescribed doses. Efforts to assist patients with adherence to medications might improve the benefits of prescribed medications, but also might increase their adverse effects.
To update a review summarizing the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to help patients follow prescriptions for medications for medical problems, including mental disorders but not addictions.
We updated searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PsycINFO (all via OVID) and Sociological Abstracts (via CSA) in January 2007 with no language restriction. We also reviewed bibliographies in articles on patient adherence and articles in our personal collections, and contacted authors of relevant original and review articles.
Articles were selected if they reported an unconfounded RCT of an intervention to improve adherence with prescribed medications, measuring both medication adherence and treatment outcome, with at least 80% follow-up of each group studied and, for long-term treatments, at least six months follow-up for studies with positive initial findings.
Study design features, interventions and controls, and results were extracted by one review author and confirmed by at least one other review author. We extracted adherence rates and their measures of variance for all methods of measuring adherence in each study, and all outcome rates and their measures of variance for each study group, as well as levels of statistical significance for differences between study groups, consulting authors and verifying or correcting analyses as needed. The studies differed widely according to medical condition, patient population, intervention, measures of adherence, and clinical outcomes. Therefore, we did not feel that quantitative analysis was scientifically justified; rather, we conducted a qualitative analysis.
For short-term treatments, four of ten interventions reported in nine RCTs showed an effect on both adherence and at least one clinical outcome, while one intervention reported in one RCT significantly improved patient adherence, but did not enhance the clinical outcome. For long-term treatments, 36 of 81 interventions reported in 69 RCTs were associated with improvements in adherence, but only 25 interventions led to improvement in at least one treatment outcome. Almost all of the interventions that were effective for long-term care were complex, including combinations of more convenient care, information, reminders, self-monitoring, reinforcement, counseling, family therapy, psychological therapy, crisis intervention, manual telephone follow-up, and supportive care. Even the most effective interventions did not lead to large improvements in adherence and treatment outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For short-term treatments several quite simple interventions increased adherence and improved patient outcomes, but the effects were inconsistent from study to study with less than half of studies showing benefits. Current methods of improving adherence for chronic health problems are mostly complex and not very effective, so that the full benefits of treatment cannot be realized. High priority should be given to fundamental and applied research concerning innovations to assist patients to follow medication prescriptions for long-term medical disorders.
开具了自我给药药物处方的患者通常服用的剂量不到规定剂量的一半。协助患者坚持服药的努力可能会提高所开药物的疗效,但也可能增加其不良反应。
更新一篇综述,总结针对帮助患者遵医嘱服用治疗包括精神障碍但不包括成瘾在内的医疗问题药物的干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)结果。
2007年1月,我们更新了对Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、国际药学文摘(IPA)、PsycINFO(均通过OVID)和社会学文摘(通过CSA)的检索,无语言限制。我们还查阅了关于患者依从性的文章的参考文献以及我们个人收藏中的文章,并联系了相关原创文章和综述文章的作者。
如果文章报告了一项关于改善药物处方依从性干预措施的无混淆RCT,同时测量药物依从性和治疗结果,每组研究的随访率至少为80%,对于长期治疗,初始结果为阳性的研究至少随访六个月,则选择该文章。
研究设计特征、干预措施和对照以及结果由一位综述作者提取,并至少由另一位综述作者确认。我们提取了每项研究中所有测量依从性方法的依从率及其方差测量值,以及每个研究组的所有结果率及其方差测量值,以及研究组之间差异的统计显著性水平,必要时咨询作者并核实或校正分析。这些研究在医疗状况、患者群体、干预措施、依从性测量方法和临床结果方面差异很大。因此,我们认为定量分析在科学上不合理;相反,我们进行了定性分析。
对于短期治疗,9项RCT中报告的10项干预措施中的4项对依从性和至少一项临床结果均有影响,而1项RCT中报告的1项干预措施显著提高了患者依从性,但未改善临床结果。对于长期治疗,69项RCT中报告的81项干预措施中的36项与依从性改善相关,但只有25项干预措施导致至少一项治疗结果得到改善。几乎所有对长期护理有效的干预措施都很复杂,包括更便捷护理、信息、提醒、自我监测、强化、咨询、家庭治疗、心理治疗、危机干预、人工电话随访和支持性护理的组合。即使是最有效的干预措施也没有导致依从性和治疗结果的大幅改善。
对于短期治疗,几种相当简单的干预措施提高了依从性并改善了患者结局,但不同研究的效果不一致,不到一半的研究显示有益处。目前改善慢性健康问题依从性的方法大多复杂且效果不佳,因此无法实现治疗的全部益处。应高度重视关于创新的基础研究和应用研究,以帮助患者遵医嘱治疗长期疾病。