Suppr超能文献

提高药物依从性的干预措施。

Interventions to enhance medication adherence.

作者信息

Haynes R B, Yao X, Degani A, Kripalani S, Garg A, McDonald H P

机构信息

McMaster University Medical Centre, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, HSC Room 2C10b, 1200 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People who are prescribed self-administered medications typically take less than half the prescribed doses. Efforts to assist patients with adherence to medications might improve the benefits of prescribed medications, but also might increase their adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To update a review summarizing the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to help patients follow prescriptions for medications for medical problems, including mental disorders but not addictions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Computerized searches were updated to September 2004 without language restriction in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA), PsycINFO and SOCIOFILE. We also reviewed bibliographies in articles on patient adherence and articles in our personal collections, and contacted authors of original and review articles on the topic.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Articles were selected if they reported an unconfounded RCT of an intervention to improve adherence with prescribed medications, measuring both medication adherence and treatment outcome, with at least 80% follow-up of each group studied and, for long-term treatments, at least six months follow-up for studies with positive initial findings.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study design features, interventions and controls, and results were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by at least one other reviewer. We extracted adherence rates and their measures of variance for all methods of measuring adherence in each study, and all outcome rates and their measures of variance for each study group, as well as levels of statistical significance for differences between study groups, consulting authors and verifying or correcting analyses as needed.

MAIN RESULTS

For short-term treatments, four of nine interventions reported in eight RCTs showed an effect on both adherence and at least one clinical outcome, while one intervention reported in one RCT significantly improved patient compliance, but did not enhance the clinical outcome. For long-term treatments, 26 of 58 interventions reported in 49 RCTs were associated with improvements in adherence, but only 18 interventions led to improvement in at least one treatment outcome. Almost all of the interventions that were effective for long-term care were complex, including combinations of more convenient care, information, reminders, self-monitoring, reinforcement, counseling, family therapy, psychological therapy, crisis intervention, manual telephone follow-up, and supportive care. Even the most effective interventions did not lead to large improvements in adherence and treatment outcomes. Six studies showed that telling patients about adverse effects of treatment did not affect their adherence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Improving short-term adherence is relatively successful with a variety of simple interventions. Current methods of improving adherence for chronic health problems are mostly complex and not very effective, so that the full benefits of treatment cannot be realized. High priority should be given to fundamental and applied research concerning innovations to assist patients to follow medication prescriptions for long-term medical disorders.

摘要

背景

被开了自行服用药物的患者通常服用的剂量不到规定剂量的一半。帮助患者坚持服药的努力可能会提高所开药物的疗效,但也可能增加其不良反应。

目的

更新一篇综述,总结针对帮助患者遵循治疗疾病(包括精神障碍但不包括成瘾)药物处方的干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)结果。

检索策略

计算机检索更新至2004年9月,检索范围包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、考克兰图书馆、国际药学文摘(IPA)、心理学文摘(PsycINFO)和社会科学文献数据库(SOCIOFILE),无语言限制。我们还查阅了关于患者依从性的文章的参考文献以及我们个人收藏中的文章,并联系了该主题原始文章和综述文章的作者。

选择标准

如果文章报告了一项关于改善药物处方依从性的干预措施的无混杂RCT,同时测量药物依从性和治疗结果,每组研究的随访率至少为80%,对于长期治疗,初始结果为阳性的研究至少随访六个月,则选择该文章。

数据收集与分析

研究设计特征、干预措施和对照以及结果由一名评审员提取,并至少由另一名评审员确认。我们提取了每项研究中所有测量依从性方法的依从率及其方差测量值,以及每个研究组的所有结果率及其方差测量值,以及研究组之间差异的统计学显著性水平,必要时咨询作者并核实或纠正分析。

主要结果

对于短期治疗,八项RCT报告的九项干预措施中有四项对依从性和至少一项临床结果有影响,而一项RCT报告的一项干预措施显著提高了患者的依从性,但未改善临床结果。对于长期治疗,49项RCT报告的58项干预措施中有26项与依从性改善相关,但只有18项干预措施导致至少一项治疗结果得到改善。几乎所有对长期护理有效的干预措施都很复杂,包括更便捷护理、信息、提醒、自我监测、强化、咨询、家庭治疗、心理治疗、危机干预、人工电话随访和支持性护理的组合。即使是最有效的干预措施也没有使依从性和治疗结果有大幅改善。六项研究表明,告知患者治疗的不良反应不会影响他们的依从性。

作者结论

通过各种简单干预措施提高短期依从性相对成功。目前改善慢性健康问题依从性的方法大多复杂且效果不佳,因此无法实现治疗的全部益处。应高度重视关于创新的基础研究和应用研究,以帮助患者遵循长期疾病的药物处方。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验