Benchimol E I, Seow C H, Steinhart A H, Griffiths A M
Hospital for Sick Children, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA, M5G 1X8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD006792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006792.pub2.
Historically, corticosteroids have been the most commonly used class of medication for induction of remission in Crohn's disease (CD). Corticosteroids down regulate production of inflammatory cytokines and interfere with NF-kappaB production, thereby blunting inflammatory response.
The primary objective was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of traditional corticosteroids (given orally or intravenously) for induction of remission in CD.
The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Functional Bowel Disorders (IBD/FBD) Group Specialized Trial Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No language restrictions were applied. Reference lists of trials and review articles, as well as recent proceedings from major gastroenterology meetings were manually searched.
Randomized, controlled clinical trials of traditional, systemic corticosteroids for the induction of remission of active CD were included in this review. Control groups included patients receiving either placebo or 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA). The study population included patients of any age with active CD (as defined by the study authors or validated clinical activity indices), receiving any formulation of systemically available corticosteroid by any oral or parenteral methods of delivery. The primary outcome was induction of remission of CD. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, change in mean CDAI, adverse events and the proportion of patients withdrawing due to adverse events.
Two independent investigators reviewed studies for eligibility, extracted the data and assessed study quality using Jadad's criteria. A random or fixed effects model was chosen based on an assessment of heterogeneity, and studies were weighted using the DerSimonian & Laird or the Mantel-Haenszel method accordingly. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.2.10 software.
Two studies compared corticosteroids to placebo and six studies compared corticosteroids to 5-ASA. Corticosteroids were found to be significantly more effective than placebo at inducing remission in CD (RR 1.99; 95% CI 1.51 to 2.64; P < 0.00001). Corticosteroids were found to be more effective than 5-ASA at inducing remission in studies with long follow-up duration (i.e. > 15 weeks; RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.03; P < 0.00001). Corticosteroids induced adverse events in a higher proportion of patients than placebo (RR 4.89; 95% CI 1.98 to 12.07; P = 0.0006), or low-dose 5-ASA (RR 2.38; 95% CI 1.34 to 4.25; P = 0.003). No difference existed in the proportion of patients experiencing adverse events when steroids were compared to high-dose 5-ASA. Steroids did not induce more study withdrawals due to adverse events than either placebo or 5-ASA.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids are effective for induction of remission in patients with CD, particularly when used for more than 15 weeks. Although corticosteroids cause more adverse events than either placebo or low-dose 5-ASA, these adverse events did not lead to increased study withdrawal in the included studies. Further information is required to determine the optimal duration of treatment and tapering protocol to maximize the efficacy of treatment with corticosteroids. Additionally, further study is required to determine whether corticosteroids are more effective in patients with certain phenotypes or when administered intravenously.
从历史上看,皮质类固醇一直是克罗恩病(CD)诱导缓解最常用的一类药物。皮质类固醇可下调炎性细胞因子的产生,并干扰核因子-κB的产生,从而减弱炎症反应。
主要目的是系统评价传统皮质类固醇(口服或静脉给药)诱导CD缓解的疗效和安全性。
检索了以下电子数据库:医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane炎症性肠病和功能性肠病(IBD/FBD)小组专业试验注册库以及美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库(ClinicalTrials.gov)。未设语言限制。还手动检索了试验和综述文章的参考文献列表以及主要胃肠病学会议的近期会议记录。
本综述纳入了传统全身皮质类固醇诱导活动期CD缓解的随机对照临床试验。对照组包括接受安慰剂或5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)的患者。研究人群包括任何年龄的活动期CD患者(由研究作者定义或经验证的临床活动指数确定),通过任何口服或肠外给药方法接受任何可全身应用的皮质类固醇制剂。主要结局是CD缓解的诱导。次要结局包括临床反应、平均CDAI的变化、不良事件以及因不良事件退出研究的患者比例。
两名独立研究人员对研究进行资格审查,提取数据并使用Jadad标准评估研究质量。根据异质性评估选择随机效应模型或固定效应模型,并相应地使用DerSimonian & Laird法或Mantel-Haenszel法对研究进行加权。使用RevMan 4.2.10软件进行荟萃分析。
两项研究将皮质类固醇与安慰剂进行了比较,六项研究将皮质类固醇与5-ASA进行了比较。发现皮质类固醇在诱导CD缓解方面比安慰剂显著更有效(RR 1.99;95%CI 1.51至2.64;P<0.00001)。在随访时间较长(即>15周)的研究中,发现皮质类固醇在诱导缓解方面比5-ASA更有效(RR 1.65;95%CI 1.33至2.03;P<0.00001)。与安慰剂(RR 4.89;95%CI 1.98至12.07;P = 0.0006)或低剂量5-ASA(RR 2.38;95%CI 1.34至4.25;P = 0.003)相比,皮质类固醇在更高比例的患者中诱发不良事件。与高剂量5-ASA相比,使用类固醇的患者发生不良事件的比例没有差异。与安慰剂或5-ASA相比,类固醇并未因不良事件导致更多的研究退出。
皮质类固醇对诱导CD患者缓解有效,尤其是使用超过15周时。虽然皮质类固醇比安慰剂或低剂量5-ASA导致更多不良事件,但在纳入的研究中,这些不良事件并未导致研究退出增加。需要更多信息来确定最佳治疗持续时间和逐渐减量方案,以最大限度地提高皮质类固醇治疗的疗效。此外,需要进一步研究以确定皮质类固醇在某些表型患者中是否更有效,或静脉给药时是否更有效。