Heart. 1997 Nov;78(5):519-23.
The national priority for reducing mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease, the resulting expansion in the number of consultant cardiologists, and the reforms of the National Health Service have produced significant changes in delivery of care for cardiac patients and in the relations between district general hospitals (DGH) and the old regional cardiac centres. 1.2 The British Cardiac Society, the Medical Royal Colleges of Physicians of London and Edinburgh, and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow established a working group to make recommendations on the most appropriate evolution of these changes to secure high quality care in a cost-effective and professionally rewarding environment. The principal conclusions of the working group were: i) The establishment of new cardiac catheterisation laboratories in DGHs remote from a major cardiac centre should be encouraged provided the workload is adequate to ensure efficient use of the facility. ii) Cardiologists working in districts close to a major centre should be encouraged to catheterise their patients at the centre. iii) Close liaison of the district cardiologist with a cardiac surgeon and interventionist is vitally important. iv) The centres will be required to provide tertiary care for emergency and urgent cases from their traditional catchment area, specialised expertise for the management of rare and difficult cases, and angioplasty. Some centres will also offer complex electrophysiology, and ablation techniques. v) The centres must also provide routine cardiology services for their local district, facilities for cardiac catheterisation for DGH cardiologists, and training for doctors, nurses, technicians, and radiographers. vi) Some centres will be linked with paediatric cardiology and paediatric cardiac surgical units. vii) District cardiac centres will be required to provide a full non-invasive diagnostic service and emergency care for patients referred by general practitioners and hospital colleagues as well as facilities for preventative and rehabilitation cardiology. Arrangements for invasive investigation and treatment of their patients will vary according mainly to the distance from the major centre. viii) Both the major centres and the district cardiac units should participate in training and research.
降低心血管疾病死亡率和发病率的国家优先事项、顾问心脏病专家数量的相应增加以及国民医疗服务体系的改革,已使心脏病患者的护理提供以及地区综合医院(DGH)与旧的地区心脏中心之间的关系发生了重大变化。1.2 英国心脏病学会、伦敦和爱丁堡皇家内科医学院以及格拉斯哥皇家内科医师和外科医师学院成立了一个工作组,就如何以最恰当的方式推动这些变革提出建议,以便在具有成本效益且能让专业人员获得回报的环境中确保高质量护理。工作组的主要结论如下:i)如果工作量足以确保设施得到有效利用,应鼓励在远离主要心脏中心的地区综合医院建立新的心导管实验室。ii)应鼓励在靠近主要中心地区工作的心脏病专家将其患者送到该中心进行导管插入术。iii)地区心脏病专家与心脏外科医生和介入专家保持密切联络至关重要。iv)这些中心将需要为来自其传统服务区域的急诊和紧急病例提供三级护理,为罕见和疑难病例的管理提供专业知识,并开展血管成形术。一些中心还将提供复杂的电生理学和消融技术。v)这些中心还必须为其所在地区提供常规心脏病学服务,为地区综合医院的心脏病专家提供心导管插入设施,并为医生、护士、技术人员和放射技师提供培训。vi)一些中心将与儿科心脏病学和儿科心脏外科单位建立联系。vii)地区心脏中心将需要为全科医生和医院同事转诊的患者提供全面的非侵入性诊断服务和急诊护理,以及预防和康复心脏病学设施。对其患者进行侵入性检查和治疗的安排将主要根据与主要中心的距离而有所不同。viii)主要中心和地区心脏单位都应参与培训和研究。