Thiel Kenneth J, Okun Alec C, Neisewander Janet L
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Aug 1;96(3):202-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
A recent thrust in drug abuse research is the influence of social interactions on drug effects. Therefore, the present study examined conditioned place preference (CPP) as a model for assessing interactions between drug and social rewards in adolescent rats. Parameters for establishing social reward-CPP were examined, including the number of conditioning sessions/day (1 or 2), the total number of sessions (2, 8, or 16), and the duration of sessions (10 or 30 min). Subsequently, the effects of cocaine or dextromethorphan on social reward-CPP and play behavior were examined. The results demonstrate that social reward-CPP (i.e., preference shift for an environment paired previously with a rat) was similar using either 1 or 2 conditioning sessions/day and either 10 or 30 min sessions; however, social reward-CPP increased as the number of social pairings increased. Additionally, a low dose of cocaine (2 mg/kg, IP) and a low number of social pairings (2 pairings) failed to produce CPP when examined alone, but together produced a robust CPP, demonstrating an interaction between these rewards. The non-rewarding drug, dextromethorphan (30 mg/kg, IP), failed to enhance social reward-CPP, suggesting that drug-enhanced social reward-CPP is specific to rewarding drugs. Surprisingly, there was no relationship between play behaviors and preference shift in drug-naïve animals. Furthermore, cocaine inhibited play behavior despite enhancing social reward-CPP, suggesting that aspects of social interaction other than play behavior likely contribute to social reward. The findings have important implications for understanding the influence of social context on cocaine reward during adolescence.
药物滥用研究的一个最新重点是社会互动对药物效应的影响。因此,本研究将条件性位置偏爱(CPP)作为一种模型,用于评估青春期大鼠药物与社会奖赏之间的相互作用。研究了建立社会奖赏-CPP的参数,包括每天的条件化训练次数(1次或2次)、训练总次数(2次、8次或16次)以及每次训练的时长(10分钟或30分钟)。随后,研究了可卡因或右美沙芬对社会奖赏-CPP和玩耍行为的影响。结果表明,使用每天1次或2次条件化训练以及每次10分钟或30分钟的训练,社会奖赏-CPP(即对先前与一只大鼠配对的环境的偏爱转移)相似;然而,社会奖赏-CPP随着社会配对次数的增加而增强。此外,单独检测时,低剂量可卡因(2毫克/千克,腹腔注射)和少量社会配对(2次配对)未能产生CPP,但两者共同作用时产生了强烈的CPP,表明这些奖赏之间存在相互作用。无奖赏作用的药物右美沙芬(30毫克/千克,腹腔注射)未能增强社会奖赏-CPP,这表明药物增强的社会奖赏-CPP是奖赏性药物所特有的。令人惊讶的是,在未接触过药物的动物中,玩耍行为与偏爱转移之间没有关系。此外,可卡因尽管增强了社会奖赏-CPP,但却抑制了玩耍行为,这表明除玩耍行为外,社会互动的其他方面可能对社会奖赏有贡献。这些发现对于理解青春期社会环境对可卡因奖赏的影响具有重要意义。