• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时荧光定量PCR检测tcdC基因与四种毒素免疫测定法及培养法在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的比较

Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

作者信息

Sloan Lynne M, Duresko Brian J, Gustafson Daniel R, Rosenblatt Jon E

机构信息

Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55906, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):1996-2001. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00032-08. Epub 2008 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.00032-08
PMID:18434563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2446834/
Abstract

We have developed a rapid real-time PCR method using fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes and the LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics), which will detect the presence of the tcdC gene of Clostridium difficile in stool samples. Our PCR method also will identify the presence of base pair deletions, one of which (18 bp) has been associated with the "epidemic" toxin-hyperproducing strains. We compared the results of this PCR with those of three C. difficile toxin-detecting enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), an EIA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and culture of C. difficile. A total of 200 stool specimens were studied by the methods under comparison. C. difficile was isolated from 49 specimens by culture, and 44 of these were confirmed as containing one of the genes associated with toxin production ("toxigenic culture"). Using toxigenic culture as the "gold standard", the sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, of the assays were 48%, 98%, 88%, and 87% for the Premier toxin A and B test; 48%, 99%, 91%, and 87% for the ImmunoCard toxin A & B test; 48%, 84%, 46%, and 85% for the Xpect C. difficile toxin A/B test; 32%, 100%, 100%, and 84% for the Triage C. difficile panel (for toxin A); and 86%, 97%, 90%, and 96% for the LightCycler PCR. Thus, in comparison to the sensitivity of toxigenic culture, the sensitivities of the toxin immunoassays were unacceptably low, while the LightCycler real-time PCR assay for the detection of the tcdC gene of C. difficile is sensitive and specific.

摘要

我们开发了一种使用荧光共振能量转移探针和罗氏诊断公司的LightCycler的快速实时PCR方法,该方法可检测粪便样本中艰难梭菌tcdC基因的存在。我们的PCR方法还能识别碱基对缺失的情况,其中一种(18bp)与“流行”的毒素高产菌株有关。我们将该PCR结果与三种艰难梭菌毒素检测酶免疫测定法(EIA)、一种检测谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)的EIA以及艰难梭菌培养结果进行了比较。总共200份粪便标本通过这些比较方法进行了研究。通过培养从49份标本中分离出艰难梭菌,其中44份被确认为含有与毒素产生相关的基因之一(“产毒培养”)。以产毒培养作为“金标准”,Premier毒素A和B检测的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为48%、98%、88%和87%;ImmunoCard毒素A和B检测为48%、99%、91%和87%;Xpect艰难梭菌毒素A/B检测为48%、84%、46%和85%;Triage艰难梭菌检测板(针对毒素A)为32%、100%、100%和84%;LightCycler PCR为86%、97%、90%和96%。因此,与产毒培养的灵敏度相比,毒素免疫测定法的灵敏度低得令人无法接受,而用于检测艰难梭菌tcdC基因的LightCycler实时PCR测定法灵敏且特异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.实时荧光定量PCR检测tcdC基因与四种毒素免疫测定法及培养法在艰难梭菌感染诊断中的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;46(6):1996-2001. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00032-08. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
2
Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.BD GeneOhm Cdiff 实时 PCR 检测法与两步法算法和毒素 A/B 酶联免疫吸附试验比较,用于诊断产毒艰难梭菌感染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):109-14. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01630-09. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
3
Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.评价 tcdB 实时 PCR 在产毒艰难梭菌三步诊断算法中的应用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):124-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00734-09. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
4
Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.结合毒素免疫测定和粪便培养诊断艰难梭菌感染的算法
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Sep;47(9):2952-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00609-09. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
5
Comparison of four commercially available rapid enzyme immunoassays with cytotoxin assay for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin(s) from stool specimens.四种市售快速酶免疫测定法与细胞毒素测定法用于检测粪便标本中艰难梭菌毒素的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1142-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1142-1147.1994.
6
Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.临床实验室中采用多重检测算法检测艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):889-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01801-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
7
Laboratory comparison between cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay and ultrasensitive single molecule counting technology for detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins A and B, PCR, enzyme immunoassays, and multistep algorithms.实验室比较细胞毒性中和测定法与超敏单分子计数技术,用于检测艰难梭菌毒素 A 和 B、PCR、酶免疫测定法和多步骤算法。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;95(1):20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
[Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital].[对从马尔马拉大学医院腹泻住院患者中分离出的艰难梭菌菌株毒素基因的研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Jan;45(1):1-10.
9
Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens.三种快速检测粪便标本中艰难梭菌毒素A和毒素B方法的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;26(2):115-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0251-7.
10
Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens.三种从粪便标本中快速检测艰难梭菌毒素A和B的商业方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Nov;46(11):3833-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01060-08. Epub 2008 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of three commercial rapid immunoassays for the diagnosis of infection.三种用于感染诊断的商用快速免疫测定法的评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Aug 5;13(8):e0340524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03405-24. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
2
Overview of current detection methods and microRNA potential in infection screening. 感染筛查中当前检测方法和 microRNA 潜力概述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 14;29(22):3385-3399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i22.3385.
3
Daptomycin-Associated Diarrhea: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.达托霉素相关性腹泻:一例病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2022 Jun 20;14(6):e26135. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26135. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Clostridioides difficile colonization among very young children in resource-limited settings.资源有限环境中非常年幼的儿童中艰难梭菌定植。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jul;28(7):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Reduction in Health Care Facility-Onset Infection: A Quality Improvement Initiative.减少医疗机构内感染:一项质量改进举措。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Nov 10;5(6):1066-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.09.004. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Kinetics of polymerase chain reaction positivity in patients with infection.感染患者中聚合酶链反应阳性的动力学
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 8;14:17562848211050443. doi: 10.1177/17562848211050443. eCollection 2021.
7
New Developments in PCR-Based Diagnostics for Bacterial Pathogens Causing Gastrointestinal Infections-A Narrative Mini-Review on Challenges in the Tropics.基于PCR的胃肠道感染细菌病原体诊断新进展——关于热带地区挑战的叙述性综述
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 2;6(2):96. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed6020096.
8
D-index as a marker of bloodstream infections in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.D 指数作为异基因造血干细胞移植患者血流感染的标志物。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;23(4):e13588. doi: 10.1111/tid.13588. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
9
Clostridioides difficile laboratory diagnostic techniques: a comparative approach of rapid and molecular methods.艰难梭菌实验室诊断技术:快速与分子方法的比较研究。
Arch Microbiol. 2021 May;203(4):1683-1690. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-02148-8. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
10
Prevalence of Infection in Critically Ill Patients with Extreme Leukocytosis and Diarrhea.极重度白细胞增多症和腹泻的重症患者感染患病率
Infect Dis Rep. 2021 Jan 1;13(1):18-22. doi: 10.3390/idr13010003.

本文引用的文献

1
Increase in Clostridium difficile-related mortality rates, United States, 1999-2004.1999 - 2004年美国艰难梭菌相关死亡率的上升
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;13(9):1417-9. doi: 10.3201/eid1309.061116.
2
Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea.通过实时聚合酶链反应检测粪便样本中产毒素艰难梭菌以诊断艰难梭菌相关性腹泻。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 1;45(9):1152-60. doi: 10.1086/522185. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
3
The challenges posed by reemerging Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌再发感染带来的挑战。
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jul 15;45(2):222-7. doi: 10.1086/518874. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
4
Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin: comparison of enzyme immunoassay results with results obtained by cytotoxicity assay.艰难梭菌毒素检测:酶免疫测定结果与细胞毒性测定结果的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Aug;45(8):2737-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00686-07. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
5
Evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a prospective multicentre study.一项前瞻性多中心研究中实时荧光定量PCR与传统诊断方法用于艰难梭菌相关性腹泻检测的评估
J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jan;56(Pt 1):36-42. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46680-0.
6
tcdC genotypes associated with severe TcdC truncation in an epidemic clone and other strains of Clostridium difficile.与流行克隆及其他艰难梭菌菌株中严重TcdC截短相关的tcdC基因型
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jan;45(1):215-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01599-06. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
7
Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.1996 - 2003年美国短期住院医院出院患者的艰难梭菌感染情况
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;12(3):409-15. doi: 10.3201/eid1205.051064.
8
Binary toxin-producing, large clostridial toxin-negative Clostridium difficile strains are enterotoxic but do not cause disease in hamsters.产生二元毒素、大梭菌毒素阴性的艰难梭菌菌株具有肠毒性,但不会在仓鼠中引起疾病。
J Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;193(8):1143-50. doi: 10.1086/501368. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
9
Effective detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile by a two-step algorithm including tests for antigen and cytotoxin.通过包括抗原检测和细胞毒素检测的两步算法有效检测产毒艰难梭菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):1145-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1145-1149.2006.
10
An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.一种艰难梭菌的流行、毒素基因变异菌株。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2433-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. Epub 2005 Dec 1.