Suppr超能文献

局灶性癫痫发作期活动的扩散

Spread of ictal activity in focal epilepsy.

作者信息

Götz-Trabert Katrin, Hauck Christoph, Wagner Kathrin, Fauser Susanne, Schulze-Bonhage Andreas

机构信息

Epilepsy Centre, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2008 Sep;49(9):1594-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01627.x. Epub 2008 Apr 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Latencies between seizure onset, propagation of ictal activity, and initial clinical symptoms and signs are critically important for the successful implementation of detection-based intervention systems in the treatment of epilepsy. This study analyzes intracranial EEG-recordings for temporal characteristics of ictal spread and its dependence on focus localization.

METHODS

Intracerebral EEG recordings of 215 seizures from 43 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy were evaluated based on site of first propagation, latencies between EEG seizure onset, early propagation, and clinical seizure onset. Seizure onset was mesial temporal in 15 patients, neocortical temporal in 15 patients, and frontal in 13 patients.

RESULTS

Periods during which ictal activity remained confined to the seizure onset area showed significant differences between the patient groups. Median latencies between electrographic seizure onset and early propagation were significantly longer for patients with mesial temporal (5 s in seizure-based analysis/10 s in patient-based analysis) as compared to neocortical temporal (3 s/5 s) and frontal seizure focus (1 s/2 s; p < 0.01). Concordantly, median latencies to onset of clinical symptomatology were significantly longer for patients with mesial temporal (17 s/19 s) as compared to neocortical temporal (11 s/17 s) and frontal seizure focus (4 s in seizure-based analysis and 6 s in patient-based analysis; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The speed of propagation of ictal activity and the latencies until initial clinical seizure symptoms differ significantly depending on focus localization. Extended spread often occurred within the time window during which current detection systems operate. This suggests that inclusion criteria of patients suitable for testing the efficacy of detection-based seizure intervention strategies should be based on focus localization and patient-individual propagation patterns.

摘要

目的

癫痫发作起始、痫性活动传播以及初始临床症状和体征之间的潜伏期对于基于检测的干预系统在癫痫治疗中的成功实施至关重要。本研究分析颅内脑电图记录,以探讨痫性传播的时间特征及其与病灶定位的关系。

方法

对43例药物难治性局灶性癫痫患者的215次发作的脑内脑电图记录进行评估,评估内容包括首次传播部位、脑电图发作起始、早期传播与临床发作起始之间的潜伏期。15例患者的发作起始位于颞叶内侧,15例患者的发作起始位于颞叶新皮质,13例患者的发作起始位于额叶。

结果

痫性活动局限于发作起始区域的时间段在不同患者组之间存在显著差异。与颞叶新皮质(基于发作分析为3秒/基于患者分析为5秒)和额叶癫痫病灶(基于发作分析为1秒/基于患者分析为2秒;p<0.01)相比,颞叶内侧患者从脑电图发作起始到早期传播的中位潜伏期显著更长(基于发作分析为5秒/基于患者分析为10秒)。同样,与颞叶新皮质(基于发作分析为11秒/基于患者分析为17秒)和额叶癫痫病灶(基于发作分析为4秒、基于患者分析为6秒;p<0.01)相比,颞叶内侧患者出现临床症状的中位潜伏期显著更长(基于发作分析为17秒/基于患者分析为19秒)。

结论

痫性活动的传播速度以及出现初始临床癫痫症状的潜伏期因病灶定位不同而存在显著差异。在当前检测系统运行的时间窗内,痫性活动常出现广泛传播。这表明,适合测试基于检测的癫痫发作干预策略疗效的患者纳入标准应基于病灶定位和患者个体的传播模式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验