Suppr超能文献

一种用于优化电子健康实施的知识应用综合策略:一项多方法研究方案。

An integrated strategy of knowledge application for optimal e-health implementation: a multi-method study protocol.

作者信息

Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Légaré France, Fortin Jean-Paul, Lamothe Lise, Labrecque Michel, Duplantie Julie

机构信息

Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Apr 24;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

E-health is increasingly valued for supporting: 1) access to quality health care services for all citizens; 2) information flow and exchange; 3) integrated health care services and 4) interprofessional collaboration. Nevertheless, several questions remain on the factors allowing an optimal integration of e-health in health care policies, organisations and practices. An evidence-based integrated strategy would maximise the efficacy and efficiency of e-health implementation. However, decisions regarding e-health applications are usually not evidence-based, which can lead to a sub-optimal use of these technologies. This study aims at understanding factors influencing the application of scientific knowledge for an optimal implementation of e-health in the health care system.

METHODS

A three-year multi-method study is being conducted in the Province of Quebec (Canada). Decision-making at each decisional level (political, organisational and clinical) are analysed based on specific approaches. At the political level, critical incidents analysis is being used. This method will identify how decisions regarding the implementation of e-health could be influenced or not by scientific knowledge. Then, interviews with key-decision-makers will look at how knowledge was actually used to support their decisions, and what factors influenced its use. At the organisational level, e-health projects are being analysed as case studies in order to explore the use of scientific knowledge to support decision-making during the implementation of the technology. Interviews with promoters, managers and clinicians will be carried out in order to identify factors influencing the production and application of scientific knowledge. At the clinical level, questionnaires are being distributed to clinicians involved in e-health projects in order to analyse factors influencing knowledge application in their decision-making. Finally, a triangulation of the results will be done using mixed methodologies to allow a transversal analysis of the results at each of the decisional levels.

RESULTS

This study will identify factors influencing the use of scientific evidence and other types of knowledge by decision-makers involved in planning, financing, implementing and evaluating e-health projects.

CONCLUSION

These results will be highly relevant to inform decision-makers who wish to optimise the implementation of e-health in the Quebec health care system. This study is extremely relevant given the context of major transformations in the health care system where e-health becomes a must.

摘要

背景

电子健康对于支持以下方面的价值日益受到重视:1)全体公民获得高质量医疗服务;2)信息流与交流;3)综合医疗服务;4)跨专业协作。然而,关于使电子健康在医疗政策、组织和实践中实现最佳整合的因素,仍存在若干问题。基于证据的综合策略将使电子健康实施的功效和效率最大化。然而,有关电子健康应用的决策通常并非基于证据,这可能导致这些技术的使用效果欠佳。本研究旨在了解影响科学知识应用的因素,以便在医疗系统中实现电子健康的最佳实施。

方法

正在加拿大魁北克省开展一项为期三年的多方法研究。基于特定方法对每个决策层面(政治、组织和临床)的决策进行分析。在政治层面,采用关键事件分析法。该方法将确定关于电子健康实施的决策如何受到或不受科学知识的影响。然后,与关键决策者进行访谈,以了解知识实际上是如何用于支持他们的决策,以及哪些因素影响了知识的使用。在组织层面,将电子健康项目作为案例研究进行分析,以探讨在技术实施过程中科学知识用于支持决策的情况。将与推动者、管理者和临床医生进行访谈,以确定影响科学知识产生和应用的因素。在临床层面,向参与电子健康项目的临床医生发放问卷,以分析影响他们在决策中应用知识的因素。最后,将使用混合方法对结果进行三角验证,以便对每个决策层面的结果进行横向分析。

结果

本研究将确定参与电子健康项目规划、融资、实施和评估的决策者使用科学证据及其他类型知识的影响因素。

结论

这些结果对于希望在魁北克医疗系统中优化电子健康实施的决策者具有高度相关性。鉴于医疗系统发生重大变革且电子健康成为必需的背景,本研究极具相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376b/2390530/7899612210e8/1472-6947-8-17-1.jpg

相似文献

4
Integrating scientific evidence to support telehomecare development in a remote region.
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Mar;15(2):195-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0070.
6
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8

引用本文的文献

1
Toward Linguistic Recognition of Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Apr 15;4:779039. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.779039. eCollection 2022.
2
Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Implementation of a Patient-Centric Digital Health Application for Primary Healthcare in India.
Healthc Inform Res. 2021 Oct;27(4):315-324. doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.4.315. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
3
Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 2;15(5):896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050896.
4
Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jan 4;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-1.
6
Institutionalizing telemedicine applications: the challenge of legitimizing decision-making.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 28;13(3):e72. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1669.
8
Integrating scientific evidence to support telehomecare development in a remote region.
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Mar;15(2):195-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0070.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006093.pub2.
2
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
3
A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 7;6:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-86.
4
Impacts of telehomecare on patients, providers, and organizations.
Telemed J E Health. 2006 Jun;12(3):363-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.363.
5
Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
6
Striving for evidence in e-health evaluation: lessons from health technology assessment.
J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11 Suppl 2:S34-6. doi: 10.1258/135763305775124722.
7
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:35-48. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308549.
8
Telehealth adoption in hospitals: an organisational perspective.
J Health Organ Manag. 2005;19(1):32-56. doi: 10.1108/14777260510592121.
9
Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine.
J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(6):318-24. doi: 10.1258/1357633042602053.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验