• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用规范化进程理论评估复杂干预措施和卫生技术:简化方法和网络工具包的开发。

Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 30;11:245. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-245.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-245
PMID:21961827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3205031/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Normalization Process Theory (NPT) can be used to explain implementation processes in health care relating to new technologies and complex interventions. This paper describes the processes by which we developed a simplified version of NPT for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers, and which could be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and on-line users manual.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2010 we undertook four tasks. (i) We presented NPT to potential and actual users in multiple workshops, seminars, and presentations. (ii) Using what we discovered from these meetings, we decided to create a simplified set of statements and explanations expressing core constructs of the theory (iii) We circulated these statements to a criterion sample of 60 researchers, clinicians and others, using SurveyMonkey to collect qualitative textual data about their criticisms of the statements. (iv) We then reconstructed the statements and explanations to meet users' criticisms, embedded them in a web-enabled toolkit, and beta tested this 'in the wild'.

RESULTS

On-line data collection was effective: over a four week period 50/60 participants responded using SurveyMonkey (40/60) or direct phone and email contact (10/60). An additional nine responses were received from people who had been sent the SurveyMonkey form by other respondents. Beta testing of the web enabled toolkit produced 13 responses, from 327 visits to http://www.normalizationprocess.org. Qualitative analysis of both sets of responses showed a high level of support for the statements but also showed that some statements poorly expressed their underlying constructs or overlapped with others. These were rewritten to take account of users' criticisms and then embedded in a web-enabled toolkit. As a result we were able translate the core constructs into a simplified set of statements that could be utilized by non-experts.

CONCLUSION

Normalization Process Theory has been developed through transparent procedures at each stage of its life. The theory has been shown to be sufficiently robust to merit formal testing. This project has provided a user friendly version of NPT that can be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and used as a heuristic device to think through implementation and integration problems.

摘要

背景

规范化进程理论(NPT)可用于解释与新技术和复杂干预措施相关的医疗保健实施过程。本文描述了我们为临床医生、管理人员和政策制定者开发简化版 NPT 的过程,该版本可嵌入到网络工具包和在线用户手册中。

方法

在 2006 年至 2010 年间,我们完成了四项任务。(一)我们在多个研讨会、研讨会和演讲中向潜在和实际用户介绍了 NPT。(二)根据这些会议的结果,我们决定创建一套简化的陈述和解释,以表达理论的核心结构。(三)我们使用 SurveyMonkey 将这些陈述分发给 60 名研究人员、临床医生和其他人员的标准样本,以收集关于他们对陈述的批评的定性文本数据。(四)然后,我们根据用户的批评意见重新构建陈述和解释,将其嵌入到一个网络工具包中,并进行了“野外”测试。

结果

在线数据收集是有效的:在四周的时间内,使用 SurveyMonkey(40/60)或直接电话和电子邮件联系(10/60)回复了 50/60 名参与者。另外还有 9 份回复是通过其他受访者发送 SurveyMonkey 表格的人收到的。对网络工具包的测试产生了 13 个回复,有 327 人访问了 http://www.normalizationprocess.org。对这两组回复的定性分析表明,这些陈述得到了高度支持,但也表明有些陈述表达其潜在结构较差或与其他陈述重叠。我们对这些陈述进行了重写,以考虑到用户的批评意见,然后将其嵌入到一个网络工具包中。因此,我们能够将核心结构转化为一套简化的陈述,供非专家使用。

结论

规范化进程理论在其生命的每个阶段都通过透明程序进行了开发。该理论已经被证明足够强大,值得进行正式测试。该项目提供了一个用户友好的 NPT 版本,可以嵌入到一个网络工具包中,并作为一种启发式工具来思考实施和整合问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d0/3205031/72e55ffecd8d/1472-6963-11-245-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d0/3205031/bbd5a1fbe75f/1472-6963-11-245-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d0/3205031/72e55ffecd8d/1472-6963-11-245-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d0/3205031/bbd5a1fbe75f/1472-6963-11-245-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4d0/3205031/72e55ffecd8d/1472-6963-11-245-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit.运用规范化进程理论评估复杂干预措施和卫生技术:简化方法和网络工具包的开发。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 30;11:245. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-245.
2
From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument.从复杂干预措施的理论到“测量”:电子健康常态化工具开发中的方法学经验教训。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 May 17;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-69.
3
Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.运用常态化进程理论对复杂医疗干预措施的可行性研究和进程评估:系统综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1.
4
A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care.一种用于评估和评价医疗保健中复杂干预措施的合理模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 7;6:86. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-86.
5
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).优化复杂干预措施的规范化:第 1 部分 - 根据规范化进程理论(NPT)开发评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y.
6
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol.改善复杂干预措施的规范化:基于规范化进程理论(NoMAD)的测量方法发展:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2013 Apr 11;8:43. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-43.
7
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development.实施评估和研究的转化框架:定性研究和仪器开发的规范化进程理论编码手册。
Implement Sci. 2022 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x.
8
A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes.运用规范化进程理论研究实施过程的定性系统评价研究。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 2;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
A Web-Based Service Delivery Model for Communication Training After Brain Injury: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Prospective, Hybrid Type 2 Implementation-Effectiveness Study.一种基于网络的脑损伤后沟通训练服务提供模式:一项混合方法、前瞻性、混合型2实施-效果研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 9;10(12):e31995. doi: 10.2196/31995.

引用本文的文献

1
How, when and why is emotional support delivered using videoconferencing by adult palliative care services successful? A realist synthesis.成人姑息治疗服务通过视频会议提供情感支持如何、何时以及为何会取得成功?一项实在论综合分析。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Aug 13;19:26323524251363271. doi: 10.1177/26323524251363271. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model.了解数字健康技术在康复中的应用:康复技术实施模型的开发。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 15:2025.07.11.25331266. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.25331266.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done?将远程医疗用于社区慢性病管理:需要做些什么?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 27;11:131. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-131.
2
Understanding patients' experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory.运用常态过程理论理解慢性心力衰竭患者的治疗负担体验。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):235-43. doi: 10.1370/afm.1249.
3
Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study.为什么电子健康计划难以实施?一项定性研究。
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: implementation strategies derived from normalization process theory.
实施评估与研究的转化框架:源自常态化过程理论的实施策略
Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 27;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01444-5.
4
Development of a complex palliative care intervention for patients with heart failure and their family carers: a theory of change approach.为心力衰竭患者及其家庭照顾者开发复杂姑息治疗干预措施:一种变革理论方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 6;24(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01776-5.
5
The SIMCA Study Protocol: Factors influencing the implementation of the Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoC) model of care in NHS maternity care in England: A mixed methods cross case analysis involving clinicians, women and policy makers.SIMCA研究方案:影响英格兰国民保健服务体系产科护理中助产士连续性照护(MCoC)模式实施的因素:一项涉及临床医生、产妇和政策制定者的混合方法跨案例分析
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 24;5:4. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13745.1. eCollection 2025.
6
Perceptions and experiences of chair-based yoga by older adults with multimorbidity - a qualitative process evaluation of the Gentle Years Yoga randomised controlled trial.患有多种疾病的老年人对椅子瑜伽的认知与体验——对“温和岁月瑜伽”随机对照试验的定性过程评估
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05782-3.
7
Delivering remote pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: a mixed-method feasibility study.在孟加拉国开展远程肺康复:一项混合方法可行性研究。
J Glob Health. 2025 Feb 14;15:04002. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04002.
8
Assessing the efficacy and safety of STOP (successful treatment for paranoia)-an app-based cognitive bias modification therapy for paranoia: a randomised clinical trial protocol.评估STOP(偏执狂成功治疗)——一种基于应用程序的偏执狂认知偏差修正疗法的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验方案。
Trials. 2024 Dec 2;25(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08570-3.
9
Using normalisation process theory (NPT) to explore implementation of the maternal perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) policy in Uganda: a reflection.利用常态化进程理论(NPT)探讨乌干达母婴围产死亡监测与应对(MPDSR)政策的实施:反思。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 4;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01191-x.
10
'A void in our community': exploring the complexities of delivering and implementing primary care services for transgender individuals in Northern Ontario.“我们社区的一个空白”:探索在安大略省北部为跨性别者提供和实施初级保健服务的复杂性。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Sep 20;25:e36. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000203.
Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 19;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6.
4
LIFELAX - diet and LIFEstyle versus LAXatives in the management of chronic constipation in older people: randomised controlled trial.LIFELAX - 饮食和生活方式与缓泻剂在老年人慢性便秘管理中的对比:随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Nov;14(52):1-251. doi: 10.3310/hta14520.
5
Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions.规范化进程理论:一种用于开发、评估和实施复杂干预措施的框架。
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63.
6
Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT).电子健康实施工具包(e-HIT)的开发和形成性评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Oct 18;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-61.
7
Embedding effective depression care: using theory for primary care organisational and systems change.嵌入有效的抑郁关怀:利用理论进行初级保健组织和系统变革。
Implement Sci. 2010 Aug 6;5:62. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-62.
8
What work has to be done to implement collaborative care for depression? Process evaluation of a trial utilizing the Normalization Process Model.要实施抑郁症的协作式护理需要做哪些工作?利用常规化进程模型进行试验的过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 10;5:15. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-15.
9
Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) training package in primary care: learning from formative evaluation.在基层医疗中提供 WISE(全面系统促进自我管理参与)培训包:从形成性评价中学习。
Implement Sci. 2010 Jan 29;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-7.
10
Protocol for the Osteoporosis Choice trial. A pilot randomized trial of a decision aid in primary care practice.骨质疏松症选择试验方案。初级保健实践中决策辅助工具的试点随机试验。
Trials. 2009 Dec 10;10:113. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-113.