Goldberg Evan J, Kautz Steven A, Neptune Richard R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Biomech. 2008;41(8):1805-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
Instrumented treadmills offer significant advantages for analysis of human locomotion, including recording consecutive steady-state gait cycles, precisely controlling walking speed, and avoiding force plate targeting. However, some studies of hemiparetic walking on a treadmill have suggested that the moving treadmill belt may fundamentally alter propulsion mechanics. Any differences in propulsion mechanics during treadmill walking would be problematic since recent studies assessing propulsion have provided fundamental insight into hemiparetic walking. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that there would be no difference in the generation of anterior/posterior (A/P) propulsion by performing a carefully controlled comparison of the A/P ground reaction forces (GRFs) and impulses in healthy adults during treadmill and overground walking. Gait data were collected from eight subjects walking overground and on a treadmill with speed and cadence controlled. Peak negative and positive horizontal GRFs in early and late stance, respectively, were reduced by less than 5% of body weight (p<0.05) during treadmill walking compared to overground walking. The magnitude of the braking impulse was similarly lower (p<0.05) during treadmill walking, but no significant difference was found between propulsion impulses. While there were some subtle differences in A/P GRFs between overground and treadmill walking, these results suggest there is no fundamental difference in propulsion mechanics. We conclude that treadmill walking can be used to investigate propulsion generation in healthy and by implication clinical populations.
仪器化跑步机为人类运动分析提供了显著优势,包括记录连续的稳态步态周期、精确控制步行速度以及避免力板定位问题。然而,一些关于偏瘫患者在跑步机上行走的研究表明,移动的跑步机皮带可能会从根本上改变推进力学。由于最近评估推进力的研究为偏瘫步行提供了基本见解,跑步机行走过程中推进力学的任何差异都将是个问题。本研究的目的是通过对健康成年人在跑步机上行走和在地面行走时的前后(A/P)地面反作用力(GRFs)和冲量进行仔细控制的比较,来检验关于A/P推进力产生没有差异的假设。从八名受试者在地面和跑步机上以受控的速度和步频行走时收集步态数据。与地面行走相比,跑步机行走时早期和晚期站立阶段的负向和正向水平GRF峰值分别降低了不到体重的5%(p<0.05)。跑步机行走时制动冲量的大小同样较低(p<0.05),但推进冲量之间未发现显著差异。虽然地面行走和跑步机行走之间的A/P GRFs存在一些细微差异,但这些结果表明推进力学没有根本差异。我们得出结论,跑步机行走可用于研究健康人群以及由此推断的临床人群中的推进力产生情况。