Suppr超能文献

地面行走和跑步机行走过程中垂直地面反作用力的比较。

Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking.

作者信息

White S C, Yack H J, Tucker C A, Lin H Y

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Exercise & Nutritional Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo 14214, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Oct;30(10):1537-42. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199810000-00011.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare vertical ground reaction forces walking overground with vertical foot-belt forces for treadmill gait.

METHODS

Twenty-four subjects walked overground and on a treadmill at three speeds (slow, normal, and fast), and at comparable cadences and stride length at each of the speeds. Treadmill and overground vertical force curves were normalized to 100% of stance time and compared using Person's product moment correlation. Selected measures from vertical force records were compared between the two modes of locomotion via repeated measures ANOVA (P < 0.05). Post-hoc analysis consisted of paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction. All comparisons were made across conditions (treadmill vs overground) at each of the three walking speeds.

RESULTS

The pattern of reaction forces were similar. Correlation between curves were 0.998, 0.983, and 0.983 for the slow (1.03-1.05 m.s-1), normal (1.40-1.44 m.s-1) and fast (1.65-1.71 m.s-1) walking trials. Small (5-9%) but significant differences in force magnitude for the two forms of locomotion were evident during mid-stance for normal (P = 0.00009) and fast (P = 0.0007) walking speeds and in late stance for normal (P = 0.0014) and fast (P = 0.0005) trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the patterns of the vertical reaction forces for the two forms of locomotion were nearly identical, small but significant differences in selected force magnitudes were evident. The interpretation of locomotion data collected on a treadmill should consider that forces during mid- and late-stance may be different than if the subject walked overground.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较在地面行走时的垂直地面反作用力与在跑步机上行走时的垂直腰带力。

方法

24名受试者以三种速度(慢、正常、快)在地面和跑步机上行走,且在每种速度下具有可比的步频和步长。跑步机和地面垂直力曲线以站立时间的100%进行归一化,并使用皮尔逊积矩相关进行比较。通过重复测量方差分析(P<0.05)比较两种运动模式下垂直力记录中的选定测量值。事后分析包括采用Bonferroni校正的配对t检验。所有比较均在三种步行速度下的各条件(跑步机与地面)之间进行。

结果

反作用力模式相似。慢走(1.03 - 1.05米/秒)、正常行走(1.40 - 1.44米/秒)和快走(1.65 - 1.71米/秒)试验中曲线的相关性分别为0.998、0.983和0.983。在正常(P = 0.00009)和快走(P = 0.0007)速度的中期站立阶段以及正常(P = 0.0014)和快走(P = 0.0005)试验的后期站立阶段,两种运动形式的力大小存在小(5 - 9%)但显著的差异。

结论

尽管两种运动形式的垂直反作用力模式几乎相同,但选定力大小存在小但显著的差异。对在跑步机上收集的运动数据的解释应考虑到中期和后期站立阶段的力可能与受试者在地面行走时不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验