van der Bogt Koen E A, Vrancken Peeters Mark-Paul F M, van Baalen Jary M, Hamming Jaap F
Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):877-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181656cc0.
To evaluate a modified technique for carotid body tumor (CBT) resection.
Resection of CBT can lead to substantial postoperative morbidity because of a rich vascularization and close connection to neurovascular structures. The impact of a modified surgical technique on postoperative outcome was evaluated and compared with a historical group and the literature.
Medical records of patients who underwent CBT surgery at Leiden University Medical Center between 1963 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Before 1992, a standard approach was conducted. After 1992, most tumors were resected using an alternative technique, working in a craniocaudal fashion from skull base to carotid bifurcation. Data were reported as details of the pre, intra-, and postoperative periods.
A total of 111 CBT resections (69 standard, 42 craniocaudal) were performed in 94 patients (44 male/50 female, mean age 41). The standard group consisted of 39 Shamblin I (56%), 22 II (32%), and 8 III (12%) tumors. The craniocaudally approached CBT included 12 Shamblin I (29%), 13 II (31%), and 17 III (40%) tumors. The mean blood loss was 901 mL (standard operations) versus 281 mL (craniocaudal approach, P < 0.0005). Persistent cranial nerve damage was encountered after 26 (23%) of 111 operations; 21 after the standard operations (30% within this group, including 3 preexistent nonresolved cranial nerve deficits); and 5 (12%, including 2 due to additional vagal body resections) after the craniocaudal operations (P = 0.025).
The craniocaudal dissection technique of a CBT can be applied with little blood loss, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative morbidity.
评估一种改良的颈动脉体瘤(CBT)切除技术。
由于颈动脉体瘤血管丰富且与神经血管结构紧密相连,其切除术后可能导致严重的并发症。本研究评估了一种改良手术技术对术后结果的影响,并与历史对照组和相关文献进行比较。
回顾性分析1963年至2005年在莱顿大学医学中心接受CBT手术患者的病历。1992年前采用标准手术方法,1992年后,大多数肿瘤采用另一种技术切除,即从颅底向颈动脉分叉处采用头尾方向操作。数据按术前、术中和术后的详细情况报告。
94例患者(44例男性/50例女性,平均年龄41岁)共进行了111例CBT切除术(69例标准手术,42例头尾方向手术)。标准组包括39例Shamblin I型(56%)、22例II型(32%)和8例III型(12%)肿瘤。头尾方向手术的CBT包括12例Shamblin I型(29%)、13例II型(31%)和17例III型(40%)肿瘤。平均失血量为901毫升(标准手术),而头尾方向手术为281毫升(P < 0.0005)。111例手术中有26例(23%)出现持续性颅神经损伤;标准手术后有21例(该组内30%,包括3例术前未解决的颅神经缺损);头尾方向手术后有5例(12%,包括2例因额外切除迷走神经体)(P = 0.025)。
颈动脉体瘤的头尾方向解剖技术可减少术中失血,从而降低术后并发症的风险。