Brown Peter I, Hughes Michael G, Tong Richard J
School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):801-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a5775.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of previous warming on high-intensity intermittent running using nonmotorized treadmill ergometry. Ten male soccer players completed a repeated sprint test (10 x 6-second sprints with 34-second recovery) on a nonmotorized treadmill preceded by an active warm-up (10 minutes of running: 70% VO2max; mean core temperature (Tc) 37.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C), a passive warm-up (hot water submersion: 40.1 +/- 0.2 degrees C until Tc reached that of the active warm-up; 10 minutes +/- 23 seconds), or no warm-up (control). All warm-up conditions were followed by a 10-minute static recovery period with no stretching permitted. After the 10-minute rest period, Tc was higher before exercise in the passive trial (38.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C) compared to the active (37.7 +/- 0.4 degrees C) and control trials (37.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C; p < 0.05). There were no differences in pre-exercise oxygen consumption and blood lactate concentration; however, heart rate was greater in the active trial (p < 0.05). The peak mean 1-second maximum speed (MxSP) and group mean MxSP were not different in the active and passive trials (7.28 +/- 0.12 and 7.16 +/- 0.10 m x s(-1), respectively, and 7.07 +/- 0.33 and 7.02 +/- 0.24 m x s(-1), respectively; p > 0.05), although both were greater than the control. The percentage of decrement in performance fatigue was similar between all conditions (active, 3.4 +/- 1.3%; passive, 4.0 +/- 2.0%; and control, 3.7 +/- 2.4%). We conclude that there is no difference in high-intensity intermittent running performance when preceded by an active or passive warm-up when matched for post-warm-up Tc. However, repeated sprinting ability is significantly improved after both active and passive warm-ups compared to no warm-up.
本研究旨在使用非电动跑步机测力计,调查先前热身对高强度间歇跑的影响。十名男性足球运动员在非电动跑步机上完成了一项重复冲刺测试(10次6秒冲刺,恢复34秒),测试前分别进行主动热身(跑步10分钟:最大摄氧量的70%;平均核心温度(Tc)37.8±0.2摄氏度)、被动热身(热水浸泡:40.1±0.2摄氏度,直到Tc达到主动热身的温度;10分钟±23秒)或不进行热身(对照组)。所有热身条件后均有10分钟的静态恢复期,不允许拉伸。在10分钟的休息期后,与主动热身组(37.7±0.4摄氏度)和对照组(37.2±0.2摄氏度;p<0.05)相比,被动试验中运动前的Tc更高(38.0±0.2摄氏度)。运动前的耗氧量和血乳酸浓度没有差异;然而,主动试验中的心率更高(p<0.05)。主动和被动试验中的峰值平均1秒最大速度(MxSP)和组平均MxSP没有差异(分别为7.28±0.12和7.16±0. I0米/秒,以及分别为7.07±0.33和7.02±0.24米/秒;p>0.05),尽管两者均高于对照组。所有条件下性能疲劳的下降百分比相似(主动组,3.4±1.3%;被动组,4.0±2.0%;对照组,3.7±2.4%)。我们得出结论,当主动或被动热身使热身后的Tc相匹配时,高强度间歇跑的表现没有差异。然而,与不进行热身相比,主动和被动热身之后重复冲刺能力均显著提高。