Vanrenterghem Jos, Lees Adrian, Clercq Dirk De
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom. j.vanrenterghem@ljmu
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 May;22(3):708-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181636c6c.
It is commonly accepted that vertical jump performance is a good indicator of maximal joint power. Some studies, however, have indicated that knee joint power output in the vertical jump is limited due to forward trunk inclination early in the push-off. The aim of this experimental study was to investigate the effect of forward trunk inclination on joint power output in vertical jumping. A group of 20 male subjects performed maximal vertical countermovement jumps from stance while minimizing the contribution of arm swing by holding their hands on their hips (arms akimbo). They also performed maximal jumps while holding the trunk as upright as possible throughout the jump, still holding the arms akimbo. Jump height, joint kinematics (angles), and joint kinetics (torque, power) were calculated. Jump height of vertical jumps while holding the trunk upright was 10% less than in normal jumps. Hip joint power was decreased by 37% while knee joint power was increased by 13%. Ankle joint power did not change. These results demonstrated that maximal jump performance does not necessarily represent maximal power of each individual joint. The implication is that jump performance may well be a good representation of overall joint power; it is, however, not an accurate measure to evaluate maximal individual joint power as part of contemporary training and rehabilitation methods.
人们普遍认为垂直跳跃成绩是最大关节功率的良好指标。然而,一些研究表明,由于起跳初期躯干前倾,垂直跳跃时膝关节的功率输出受到限制。本实验研究的目的是探讨躯干前倾对垂直跳跃时关节功率输出的影响。一组20名男性受试者从站立姿势进行最大垂直反向运动跳跃,通过双手叉腰(双臂弯曲)尽量减少摆臂的影响。他们还在整个跳跃过程中尽量保持躯干直立的同时进行最大跳跃,同样双手叉腰。计算跳跃高度、关节运动学(角度)和关节动力学(扭矩、功率)。躯干直立时垂直跳跃的高度比正常跳跃低10%。髋关节功率下降了37%,而膝关节功率增加了13%。踝关节功率没有变化。这些结果表明,最大跳跃成绩不一定代表每个单独关节的最大功率。这意味着跳跃成绩很可能是整体关节功率的良好体现;然而,作为当代训练和康复方法的一部分,它并不是评估单个关节最大功率的准确指标。