Hirasaki Shoji, Kanzaki Hiromitsu, Matsubara Minoru, Fujita Kohei, Matsumura Shuji, Suzuki Seiyuu
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Sumitomo Besshi Hospital, 3-1 Ohji-cho, Niihama 7928543, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr 28;14(16):2550-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2550.
To evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife (IT-ESD) for the treatment of patients with gastric remnant cancer.
Thirty-two patients with early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach, who underwent distal gastrectomy due to gastric carcinoma, were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or ESD at Sumitomo Besshi Hospital and Shikoku Cancer Center in the 10-year period from January 1998 to December 2007, including 17 patients treated with IT-ESD. Retrospectively, patient backgrounds, the one-piece resection rate, complete resection (CR) rate, operation time, bleeding rate, and perforation rate were compared between patients treated with conventional EMR and those treated with IT-ESD.
The CR rate (40% in the EMR group vs 82% in the IT-ESD group) was significantly higher in the IT-ESD group than in the EMR group; however, the operation time was significantly longer for the IT-ESD group (57.6 +/- 31.9 min vs 21.1 +/- 12.2 min). No significant differences were found in the rate of underlying cardiopulmonary disease (IT-ESD group, 12% vs EMR group, 13%), one-piece resection rate (100% vs 73%), bleeding rate (18% vs 6.7%), and perforation rate (0% vs 0%) between the two groups.
IT-ESD appears to be an effective treatment for gastric remnant cancer post distal gastrectomy because of its high CR rate. It is useful for histological confirmation of successful treatment. The long-term outcome needs to be evaluated in the future.
评估使用绝缘头电刀进行内镜黏膜下剥离术(IT-ESD)治疗残胃癌患者的有效性。
1998年1月至2007年12月的10年间,在住友别子医院和四国癌症中心,对32例因胃癌接受远端胃切除术的残胃早期胃癌患者进行了内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)或ESD治疗,其中17例接受了IT-ESD治疗。回顾性比较了接受传统EMR治疗的患者和接受IT-ESD治疗的患者的患者背景、整块切除率、完全切除(CR)率、手术时间、出血率和穿孔率。
IT-ESD组的CR率(EMR组为40%,IT-ESD组为82%)显著高于EMR组;然而,IT-ESD组的手术时间明显更长(57.6±31.9分钟对21.1±12.2分钟)。两组之间在基础心肺疾病发生率(IT-ESD组为12%,EMR组为13%)、整块切除率(100%对73%)、出血率(18%对6.7%)和穿孔率(0%对0%)方面未发现显著差异。
由于其高CR率,IT-ESD似乎是远端胃切除术后残胃癌的有效治疗方法。它有助于成功治疗的组织学确认。长期结果有待未来评估。