Martins Susana B, Shahar Yuval, Goren-Bar Dina, Galperin Maya, Kaizer Herbert, Basso Lawrence V, McNaughton Deborah, Goldstein Mary K
Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Artif Intell Med. 2008 May;43(1):17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
Evaluate KNAVE-II, a knowledge-based framework for visualization, interpretation, and exploration of longitudinal clinical data, clinical concepts and patterns. KNAVE-II mediates queries to a distributed temporal-abstraction architecture (IDAN), which uses a knowledge-based problem-solving method specializing in on-the-fly computation of clinical queries.
A two-phase, balanced cross-over study to compare efficiency and satisfaction of a group of clinicians when answering queries of variable complexity about time-oriented clinical data, typical for oncology protocols, using KNAVE-II, versus standard methods: both paper charts and a popular electronic spreadsheet (ESS) in Phase I; an ESS in Phase II. The measurements included the time required to answer and the correctness of answer for each query and each complexity category, and for all queries, assessed versus a predetermined gold standard set by a domain expert. User satisfaction was assessed by the Standard Usability Score (SUS) tool-specific questionnaire and by a "Usability of Tool Comparison" comparative questionnaire developed for this study.
In both evaluations, subjects answered higher-complexity queries significantly faster using KNAVE-II than when using paper charts or an ESS up to a mean of 255 s difference per query versus the ESS for hard queries (p=0.0003) in the second evaluation. Average correctness scores when using KNAVE-II versus paper charts, in the first phase, and the ESS, in the second phase, were significantly higher over all queries. In the second evaluation, 91.6% (110/120) of all of the questions asked within queries of all levels produced correct answers using KNAVE-II, opposed to only 57.5% (69/120) using the ESS (p<0.0001). User satisfaction with KNAVE-II was significantly superior compared to using either a paper chart or the ESS (p=0.006). Clinicians ranked KNAVE-II superior to both paper and the ESS.
An evaluation of the functionality and usability of KNAVE-II and its supporting knowledge-based temporal-mediation architecture has produced highly encouraging results regarding saving of physician time, enhancement of accuracy of clinical assessment, and user satisfaction.
评估KNAVE-II,这是一个基于知识的框架,用于纵向临床数据、临床概念和模式的可视化、解释及探索。KNAVE-II介导对分布式时间抽象架构(IDAN)的查询,该架构使用一种基于知识的问题解决方法,专门用于实时计算临床查询。
进行一项两阶段的平衡交叉研究,以比较一组临床医生在使用KNAVE-II回答有关肿瘤学方案中典型的面向时间的临床数据的不同复杂程度查询时,与使用标准方法(第一阶段为纸质病历和一种常用的电子表格软件(ESS);第二阶段为ESS)相比的效率和满意度。测量指标包括回答每个查询及每个复杂程度类别所需的时间、答案的正确性,所有查询的测量结果均与领域专家设定的预定金标准进行比较。通过标准可用性评分(SUS)工具特定问卷以及为本研究开发的“工具比较可用性”比较问卷来评估用户满意度。
在两项评估中,与使用纸质病历或ESS相比,受试者使用KNAVE-II回答更高复杂程度的查询速度明显更快,在第二次评估中,与ESS相比,每个查询平均快255秒(针对难题)(p = 0.0003)。在第一阶段,使用KNAVE-II与纸质病历相比,以及在第二阶段,与ESS相比,所有查询的平均正确得分显著更高。在第二次评估中,使用KNAVE-II时,所有级别查询中提出的所有问题有91.6%(110/120)给出了正确答案,而使用ESS时仅为57.5%(69/120)(p < 0.0001)。与使用纸质病历或ESS相比,用户对KNAVE-II的满意度显著更高(p = 0.006)。临床医生将KNAVE-II的排名高于纸质病历和ESS。
对KNAVE-II及其支持的基于知识的时间中介架构的功能和可用性进行评估,在节省医生时间、提高临床评估准确性和用户满意度方面产生了非常令人鼓舞的结果。