Beaulieu A D, Peloso P M, Haraoui B, Bensen W, Thomson G, Wade J, Quigley P, Eisenhoffer J, Harsanyi Z, Darke A C
Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis, Ste-Foy, Canada.
Pain Res Manag. 2008 Mar-Apr;13(2):103-10. doi: 10.1155/2008/903784.
The present study was a randomized, parallel, double-blind comparison between controlled-release (CR) tramadol and sustained-release (SR) diclofenac in patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the hips and/or knees.
Patients with at least moderate pain intensity, and having received analgesics over the past three months, underwent a two- to seven-day washout of current analgesics before initiation of 200 mg CR tramadol or 75 mg SR diclofenac. During the eight-week study, patients returned to the clinic biweekly. CR tramadol doses were titrated to a maximum of 200 mg, 300 mg or 400 mg per day. SR diclofenac doses were titrated to 75 mg or 100 mg once daily, or 75 mg twice a day based on pain relief and the presence of side effects. For rescue analgesic, patients took acetaminophen as needed, up to 650 mg three times a day.
Forty-five patients on CR tramadol and 52 patients on SR diclofenac were evaluable. Significant improvements from prestudy treatment were shown for visual analogue scale pain (P=0.0001), stiffness (P<0.0005) and physical function (P=0.0001) scores for both treatments. There were no significant differences between the two treatments in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities subscales, overall pain, pain and sleep, or the clinical effectiveness evaluation. Overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, with more opioid-related adverse events with CR tramadol, and two serious adverse events occurring with the use of SR diclofenac.
CR tramadol is as effective as SR diclofenac in the treatment of pain due to knee or hip osteoarthritis, with the potential for fewer of the serious side effects that characterize nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration.
本研究是一项针对因髋部和/或膝部骨关节炎导致慢性疼痛患者的随机、平行、双盲对照试验,比较缓释曲马多与缓释双氯芬酸的疗效。
疼痛强度至少为中度且在过去三个月内接受过镇痛药治疗的患者,在开始服用200毫克缓释曲马多或75毫克缓释双氯芬酸之前,先停用当前镇痛药两至七天。在为期八周的研究期间,患者每两周返回诊所一次。缓释曲马多的剂量逐渐滴定至最大每日200毫克、300毫克或400毫克。缓释双氯芬酸的剂量根据疼痛缓解情况和副作用的出现情况,滴定至每日75毫克或100毫克,或每日两次,每次75毫克。如需使用解救镇痛药,患者可根据需要服用对乙酰氨基酚,每日三次,每次最多650毫克。
45例服用缓释曲马多的患者和52例服用缓释双氯芬酸的患者可进行评估。两种治疗方法在视觉模拟评分法疼痛(P = 0.0001)、僵硬程度(P < 0.0005)和身体功能(P = 0.0001)评分方面均较治疗前有显著改善。在西安大略和麦克马斯特大学量表的各个子量表、总体疼痛、疼痛与睡眠或临床疗效评估方面,两种治疗方法之间无显著差异。两组不良事件的总体发生率相似,缓释曲马多导致的阿片类药物相关不良事件较多,使用缓释双氯芬酸出现了两例严重不良事件。
缓释曲马多在治疗膝部或髋部骨关节炎引起的疼痛方面与缓释双氯芬酸同样有效,且严重副作用可能少于非甾体抗炎药。