Duyck Wouter, Lagrou Evelyne, Gevers Wim, Fias Wim
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(2):73-81. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.2.73.
Earlier research with monolinguals and bilinguals showed that numbers may be named through both a semantic and a phonological route, depending on the number's language and format (Arabic or verbal), task demands, and naming language. The present study investigated the importance of the semantic route for the processing of a third representation of magnitude, namely Roman digits. Using an interference paradigm, we showed that the processing of Roman target digits is influenced by Arabic digit distractors, both in a naming task and a parity judgment task. Roman digits were processed faster if the target and distractor were of the same magnitude. If this was not the case, processing speed slowed down as the numerical distance between target and distractor increased. This strongly suggests that semantic access is mandatory when naming Roman digits. Implications are discussed for the number processing domain and for models of translation in bilinguals.
早期针对单语者和双语者的研究表明,数字可以通过语义和语音两种途径进行命名,这取决于数字的语言和格式(阿拉伯数字或文字形式)、任务要求以及命名语言。本研究调查了语义途径对于处理数量的第三种表示形式——罗马数字的重要性。使用干扰范式,我们发现,在命名任务和奇偶判断任务中,罗马目标数字的处理都会受到阿拉伯数字干扰项的影响。如果目标数字和干扰项的数值大小相同,那么对罗马数字的处理速度会更快。如果情况并非如此,随着目标数字和干扰项之间数值距离的增加,处理速度会减慢。这有力地表明,在命名罗马数字时,语义通达是必不可少的。文中讨论了这一结果对数字处理领域以及双语者翻译模型的启示。