Liu Mengrong, Pei Yilai, Pang Weiguo
School of Education, Zhejiang International Studies University, 299 Liuhe Road, Hangzhou 310023, China.
China Institute of Education and Social Development, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Beijing 100875, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;15(6):806. doi: 10.3390/bs15060806.
Negative feedback is both common and important in the creative process. However, research has shown inconsistent effects of negative feedback on creativity, and individual characteristics may moderate the impact of negative feedback on creative performance. This study explores how creative self-efficacy and a creative developmental mindset interact to influence creative performance in response to negative feedback. One hundred and twenty-two university students were recruited to complete the Creative Self-Efficacy Scale and the Creative Mindset Scale. They also participated in two Alternative Uses Tasks and one Realistic Presented Problem, both before and after receiving pseudo negative feedback. The results indicated that individuals with high creative self-efficacy and a low developmental mindset generated more Realistic Presented Problem solutions after negative feedback, while those with high creative self-efficacy and a high developmental mindset generated more original Realistic Presented Problem solutions. These findings are discussed in relation to the self-enhancement and self-improvement motivations. Based on our results, the role of creative self-efficacy and a developmental mindset should be considered when delivering negative feedback. Our research also highlights ways to foster creativity in educational and workplace settings.
负反馈在创作过程中既常见又重要。然而,研究表明负反馈对创造力的影响并不一致,个体特征可能会调节负反馈对创作表现的影响。本研究探讨了创造性自我效能感和创造性发展心态如何相互作用,以影响对负反馈的创作表现。招募了122名大学生完成创造性自我效能量表和创造性心态量表。他们还在接受伪负反馈前后分别参与了两项替代用途任务和一项现实呈现问题。结果表明,具有高创造性自我效能感和低发展心态的个体在负反馈后生成了更多现实呈现问题的解决方案,而具有高创造性自我效能感和高发展心态的个体则生成了更多新颖的现实呈现问题的解决方案。结合自我提升和自我完善动机对这些发现进行了讨论。基于我们的结果,在提供负反馈时应考虑创造性自我效能感和发展心态的作用。我们的研究还强调了在教育和工作场所环境中培养创造力的方法。