Teroni Fabrice, Deonna Julien A
Department of Philosophy, University of Geneva, 2 rue de Candolle, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):725-40. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
How does shame differ from guilt? Empirical psychology has recently offered distinct and seemingly incompatible answers to this question. This article brings together four prominent answers into a cohesive whole. These are that (a) shame differs from guilt in being a social emotion; (b) shame, in contrast to guilt, affects the whole self; (c) shame is linked with ideals, whereas guilt concerns prohibitions and (d) shame is oriented towards the self, guilt towards others. After presenting the relevant empirical evidence, we defend specific interpretations of each of these answers and argue that they are related to four different dimensions of the emotions. This not only allows us to overcome the conclusion that the above criteria are either unrelated or conflicting with one another, it also allows us to tell apart what is constitutive from what is typical of them.
羞耻感与内疚感有何不同?实证心理学最近对这个问题给出了截然不同且看似相互矛盾的答案。本文将四个突出的答案整合为一个连贯的整体。它们分别是:(a)羞耻感作为一种社会情感与内疚感不同;(b)与内疚感相反,羞耻感影响整个自我;(c)羞耻感与理想相关,而内疚感涉及禁令;(d)羞耻感指向自我,内疚感指向他人。在呈现相关实证证据后,我们为这些答案中的每一个进行了具体阐释,并认为它们与情感的四个不同维度相关。这不仅使我们能够克服上述标准要么互不相关要么相互冲突的结论,还能让我们区分出它们的构成要素和典型特征。