文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

大学生的榜样、学习风格偏好与合作教学中的学业成绩:绝对思维与相对思维

College students' role models, learning style preferences, and academic achievement in collaborative teaching: absolute versus relativistic thinking.

作者信息

Chiou Wen-Bin

机构信息

Center for Teacher Education Program, National Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 70, Lien-Hai Rd., Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan, R.O.C.

出版信息

Adolescence. 2008 Spring;43(169):129-42.


DOI:
PMID:18447085
Abstract

Based on the perspective of postformal operations, this study investigated whether college students' role models (technical teachers vs. lecturing teachers) and preferred learning styles (experience-driven mode vs. theory-driven mode) in collaborative teaching courses would be moderated by their cognitive development (absolute thinking vs. relativistic thinking) and examine whether academic achievement of students would be contingent upon their preferred learning styles. Two hundred forty-four college students who have taken the technical courses with collaborative teaching participated in this study. The results showed that those participants with absolute thinking perceived the modeling advantage of technical teachers was greater than that of lecturing teachers, preferred the experience-driven mode over the theory-driven mode, and displayed differential academic achievement between technical courses and general courses. On the other hand, the students with relativistic thinking revealed no difference in perceived modeling advantage of role models, learning styles preferences, and academic achievement between two categories of courses. In addition, this research indicates that college students' preferred learning styles would interact with course category (technical courses vs. general courses) to display differential academic achievement. Implications and future directions are discussed.

摘要

基于后形式运算的视角,本研究调查了在协作教学课程中,大学生的榜样(技术教师与讲授教师)和偏好的学习方式(经验驱动模式与理论驱动模式)是否会受到其认知发展(绝对思维与相对思维)的调节,并检验学生的学业成绩是否取决于他们偏好的学习方式。244名参加过协作教学技术课程的大学生参与了本研究。结果表明,具有绝对思维的参与者认为技术教师的榜样优势大于讲授教师,更喜欢经验驱动模式而非理论驱动模式,并且在技术课程和普通课程之间表现出不同的学业成绩。另一方面,具有相对思维的学生在两类课程的榜样优势感知、学习方式偏好和学业成绩方面没有差异。此外,本研究表明,大学生偏好的学习方式会与课程类别(技术课程与普通课程)相互作用,从而表现出不同的学业成绩。文中还讨论了研究的意义和未来方向。

相似文献

[1]
College students' role models, learning style preferences, and academic achievement in collaborative teaching: absolute versus relativistic thinking.

Adolescence. 2008

[2]
Teachers' modeling advantage and their modeling effects on college students' learning styles and occupational stereotypes: a case of collaborative teaching in technical courses.

Adolescence. 2006

[3]
Regulatory mode preferences for autonomy supporting versus controlling instructional styles.

Br J Educ Psychol. 2009-2-24

[4]
Thinking styles: university students' preferred teaching styles and their conceptions of effective teachers.

J Psychol. 2004-5

[5]
Enhancement of achievement and attitudes through individualized learning-style presentations of two allied health courses.

J Allied Health. 1998

[6]
Revisiting the concept of 'style match'.

Br J Educ Psychol. 2013-2-21

[7]
Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China.

Nurs Health Sci. 2008-9

[8]
Teachers as scholars of their students' conceptions of learning: a Hong Kong investigation.

Br J Educ Psychol. 2004-9

[9]
Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning.

Br J Educ Psychol. 2005-9

[10]
Academic emotions from a social-cognitive perspective: antecedents and domain specificity of students' affect in the context of Latin instruction.

Br J Educ Psychol. 2006-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索