Miller J A
College of Health Related Professions, State University of New York, Health Sciences Center at Brooklyn 11203, USA.
J Allied Health. 1998 Fall;27(3):150-6.
This investigation analyzed the effects of the instructional resource Programmed Learning Sequence (PLS) on the achievement and attitudes of college students and correlated the findings with the individuals' learning styles. The subjects were enrolled in Sonography I and Cross-Sectional Anatomy in a college of health-related professions. Both classes were administered the Productivity Environmental Preference Survey to identify learning-style strengths, and alternately presented with lessons using a PLS in a book format and traditional lectures. The sonography class also was exposed to a PLS in multimedia computer format. The Semantic Differential Scale measured the students' attitudes comparing the instructional methods experienced, and class examinations measured content mastery. In both classes, examination scores were significantly higher (effect size for the sonography class was 1.42; for the anatomy class, 0.63) and students' attitude scores were significantly higher when PLS rather than the traditional method was used. In the sonography class, achievement was significantly higher with the book PLS than with the computer PLS (effect size, 1.11). Significant correlations emerged between learning-style elements and achievement: students who preferred learning with the book PLS required more quiet in the environment than did those who preferred the computer PLS; students who preferred learning traditionally and with the computer PLS required more light than those preferring the book PLS; and students who preferred learning with an authority figure favored the traditional method. Examination of the data for other correlations between learning-style preferences and attitudes using the book PLS also revealed many other significant findings, demonstrating its ability to accommodate diverse styles.
本研究分析了教学资源“程序学习序列”(PLS)对大学生成绩和态度的影响,并将研究结果与个体的学习风格相关联。研究对象为一所健康相关专业学院的超声检查I和横断面解剖学课程的学生。两个班级都进行了“生产力环境偏好调查”以确定学习风格优势,然后交替使用书本形式的PLS课程和传统讲座进行授课。超声检查课程还采用了多媒体计算机格式的PLS。语义差异量表用于测量学生对所经历教学方法的态度,课堂考试用于测量对内容的掌握程度。在两个班级中,当使用PLS而非传统方法时,考试成绩显著更高(超声检查课程的效应量为1.42;解剖学课程为0.63),学生的态度得分也显著更高。在超声检查课程中,书本形式的PLS的成绩显著高于计算机形式的PLS(效应量为1.11)。学习风格要素与成绩之间出现了显著相关性:与喜欢计算机形式PLS的学生相比,喜欢书本形式PLS学习的学生在环境中需要更安静;与喜欢书本形式PLS的学生相比,喜欢传统学习方式和计算机形式PLS的学生需要更多光线;喜欢在权威人物指导下学习的学生更倾向于传统方法。对使用书本形式PLS的学习风格偏好与态度之间的其他相关性数据进行检查还发现了许多其他显著结果,表明其能够适应不同的风格。