Suppr超能文献

儿童使用两种握力计的年龄特异性可靠性。

Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.

作者信息

Molenaar H M Ties, Zuidam J Michiel, Selles Ruud W, Stam Henk J, Hovius Steven E R

机构信息

Research Unit, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Room Ee.1591, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1053-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter, two instruments often used to assess grip strength, have good validity and reliability when employed to evaluate adults. Grip strength measurements are often performed to assess children with hand disorders. However, the reliability of these measurements when used to assess children under the age of twelve years is unknown. In addition, it is not clear whether reliability differs between younger and older children. The purpose of this study was to establish test-retest reliability for different age groups and to determine which instrument is the most reliable.

METHODS

One hundred and four children from a primary school were included. Subjects were divided into three groups: four to six, seven to nine, and ten to twelve years of age. The grip strength of both hands was measured with the Lode dynamometer (equivalent to the Jamar dynamometer) and with the Martin vigorimeter. The mean of three maximum voluntary contractions was recorded for all measurements. A retest was performed after a mean interval of twenty-nine days.

RESULTS

In the total group, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the Lode dynamometer was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 0.98) for the dominant hand and 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 0.96) for the nondominant hand and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the Martin vigorimeter was 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.89) for the dominant hand and 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.90) for the nondominant hand. The intraclass correlation coefficients in the different age groups were lower than those in the total group because of a lower between-subject variation. The normalized smallest detectable difference between the test and retest values was approximately 25% for the Lode dynamometer and approximately 31% for the Martin vigorimeter.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the Lode dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter are reliable instruments with which to measure the grip strength of children under twelve years of age; however, the Lode dynamometer has better test-retest reliability. Furthermore, comparison of the smallest detectable differences showed the Lode dynamometer to be a more accurate instrument.

摘要

背景

Jamar握力计和Martin活力计是常用于评估握力的两种仪器,在用于评估成年人时具有良好的效度和信度。握力测量常被用于评估患有手部疾病的儿童。然而,这些测量方法用于评估12岁以下儿童时的信度尚不清楚。此外,也不清楚年幼儿童和年长儿童之间的信度是否存在差异。本研究的目的是确定不同年龄组的重测信度,并确定哪种仪器最可靠。

方法

纳入了一所小学的104名儿童。受试者被分为三组:4至6岁、7至9岁和10至12岁。使用Lode握力计(相当于Jamar握力计)和Martin活力计测量双手的握力。所有测量均记录三次最大自主收缩的平均值。在平均间隔29天后进行重测。

结果

在整个组中,Lode握力计优势手的组内相关系数为0.97(95%置信区间,0.95至0.98),非优势手为0.95(95%置信区间,0.92至0.96);Martin活力计优势手的组内相关系数为0.84(95%置信区间,0.77至0.89),非优势手为0.86(95%置信区间,0.80至0.90)。由于受试者间变异较小,不同年龄组的组内相关系数低于整个组。Lode握力计测试值与重测值之间的标准化最小可检测差异约为25%,Martin活力计约为31%。

结论

Lode握力计和Martin活力计都是测量12岁以下儿童握力的可靠仪器;然而,Lode握力计具有更好的重测信度。此外,最小可检测差异的比较表明Lode握力计是一种更精确 的仪器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验