• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马丁握力计测量韩国成年人握力的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Sejong, Korea.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Sejong, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):610-619. doi: 10.4055/cios23383. Epub 2024 Jun 7.

DOI:10.4055/cios23383
PMID:39092298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11262940/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Grip strength is important for fine motor skills, and one of the measurement tools for grip strength is the Martin Vigorimeter (MV) dynamometer. Studies on establishing the reliability and validity of the MV in Koreans are limited. We aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the MV for grip strength measurement in healthy Korean adults by comparing it with the Jamar dynamometer, the standard tool used by the American Society of Hand Therapists.

METHODS

In total, 99 healthy participants (50 men and 49 women) were enrolled. Grip strength was measured using the Jamar dynamometer and MV. Reliability and validity were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC). The correlation between the measurements of the instruments was analyzed using Pearson's correlation. The effect of hand anthropometry was evaluated, and the conversion equation between the instruments was calculated.

RESULTS

MV showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.90, < 0.001) and validity with a high correlation (0.7 ≤ < 0.9) with the Jamar dynamometer. The MDC was acceptable for detecting minimal clinically important differences (< 19.5%) in both instruments (Jamar: 3.4%-6.7%, MV: 3.8% to 6.3%). The grip strength measured using the MV was independent of hand anthropometry, unlike that using the Jamar dynamometer.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insights into the relationship between the Jamar and MV instruments for measuring grip strength in Koreans. The MV is a viable alternative to the Jamar dynamometer in Koreans, offering not only reproducible and reliable measurements of grip strength but also the advantage of being unaffected by variations in hand anthropometry.

摘要

背景

握力对于精细运动技能很重要,握力的测量工具之一是 Martin Vigorimeter(MV)测力计。关于 MV 在韩国人群中可靠性和有效性的研究有限。我们旨在通过与美国手治疗师协会(American Society of Hand Therapists)使用的标准工具 Jamar 测力计相比,来确定 MV 测量健康韩国成年人握力的可靠性和有效性。

方法

共有 99 名健康参与者(50 名男性和 49 名女性)被纳入研究。使用 Jamar 测力计和 MV 测量握力。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和最小可检测变化量(MDC)评估可靠性和有效性。使用 Pearson 相关分析评估仪器测量值之间的相关性。评估手人类学的影响,并计算仪器之间的转换方程。

结果

MV 与 Jamar 测力计具有高度相关性(0.7≤ < 0.9),显示出极好的可靠性(ICC>0.90, <0.001)。MDC 可接受,可检测两种仪器的最小临床重要差异(<19.5%)(Jamar:3.4%-6.7%,MV:3.8%至 6.3%)。与 Jamar 测力计不同,MV 测量的握力不受手人类学的影响。

结论

本研究提供了关于 Jamar 和 MV 仪器在韩国人群中测量握力的关系的见解。MV 是 Jamar 测力计的一种可行替代方法,不仅提供可重复且可靠的握力测量,而且不受手人类学变化的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/1a052ca3fb81/cios-16-610-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/08c3294709e1/cios-16-610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/ef41f0fd210a/cios-16-610-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/e7810f3af3ef/cios-16-610-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/cbc38f58893c/cios-16-610-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/1a052ca3fb81/cios-16-610-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/08c3294709e1/cios-16-610-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/ef41f0fd210a/cios-16-610-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/e7810f3af3ef/cios-16-610-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/cbc38f58893c/cios-16-610-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/11262940/1a052ca3fb81/cios-16-610-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.马丁握力计测量韩国成年人握力的可靠性和有效性。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):610-619. doi: 10.4055/cios23383. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
2
The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.对于评估老年患者的握力,马丁握力计是一种比贾马尔测力计更可靠且更实用的工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026.
3
Martin Vigorimeter assesses muscle fatigability in older adults better than the Jamar Dynamometer.马丁握力计比 Jamar 握力计更能评估老年人的肌肉疲劳度。
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Oct 1;111:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
4
Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.儿童使用两种握力计的年龄特异性可靠性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1053-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469.
5
Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.测量老年人的握力:握力球与贾马尔测力计的比较。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;38(3):148-53. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000034.
6
Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.《研究与握力计相比,压力传感器型握力计的可靠性和有效性,以及可靠握力测量次数。》
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Oct;28(5):562-572. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500601. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population.在健康老年人群中比较Jamar握力计和Martin握力计用于测量握力的情况。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Sep;27(3):137-43.
8
Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies: Vigorimeter vs. Jamar.免疫介导性神经病的握力比较:握力计与贾马尔握力计
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2015 Sep;20(3):269-76. doi: 10.1111/jns.12126.
9
Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.50 岁以上社区居住成年人使用两种握力计的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6.
10
Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults.使用数字手持式测力计验证健康年轻成年人和老年人握力强度与年龄相关变化的能力。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 20;2020:6936879. doi: 10.1155/2020/6936879. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Definition and diagnosis of sarcopenia: Asia-Pacific perspectives.肌肉减少症的定义与诊断:亚太地区视角
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2025 Jun;11(2 Suppl):2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2025.05.004. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
2
Enhancing cognitive and physical performance in older adults through wearable sensor-based interactive cognitive-motor training: a randomized clinical trial.通过基于可穿戴传感器的交互式认知运动训练提高老年人的认知和身体表现:一项随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03725-x.
3
Efficacy of partial toe and iliac bone transfer for reconstruction of grade I-III fingers' defects.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement and Interpretation of Handgrip Strength for Research on Sarcopenia and Osteoporosis.用于肌肉减少症和骨质疏松症研究的握力测量与解读
J Bone Metab. 2020 May;27(2):85-96. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.2.85. Epub 2020 May 31.
2
Muscular grip strength normative values for a Korean population from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2014-2015.2014-2015 年韩国国民健康营养调查的韩国人群肌肉握力正常值。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 20;13(8):e0201275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201275. eCollection 2018.
3
Comparison of the Grip Strength Using the Martin-Vigorimeter and the JAMAR-Dynamometer: Establishment of Normal Values.
部分足趾与髂骨移植重建Ⅰ-Ⅲ度手指缺损的疗效
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 5;26(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08434-0.
使用马丁握力计和JAMAR握力计测量握力的比较:正常值的确定。
In Vivo. 2017 Sep-Oct;31(5):917-924. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11147.
4
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
5
The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.对于评估老年患者的握力,马丁握力计是一种比贾马尔测力计更可靠且更实用的工具。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026.
6
Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years.采用高精度握力计对5至80岁健康受试者测量握力。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jun 10;16:139. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0612-4.
7
What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength?握力的最小临床重要差异是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2536-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3666-y. Epub 2014 May 10.
8
Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.统计专栏:医学研究中相关系数合理应用指南
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71.
9
Optimal Jamar dynamometer handle position to assess maximal isometric hand grip strength in epidemiological studies.在流行病学研究中评估最大等长握力时,Jamar握力计的最佳手柄位置。
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Nov;37(11):2368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.014.
10
Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.儿童使用两种握力计的年龄特异性可靠性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1053-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469.