• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Testing the validity of a translated pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life instrument, using qualitative 'think aloud' methodology.

作者信息

Renberg T, Kettis Lindblad A, Tully M P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Jun;33(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00921.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00921.x
PMID:18452415
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In pharmacy practice, there is a need for valid and reliable instruments to study patient-reported outcomes. One potential candidate is a pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life (PTRQoL) instrument. This study explored the face and content validity, including cognitive aspects of question answering of a PTRQoL instrument, translated from English to Swedish.

METHOD

A sample of 16 customers at Swedish community pharmacies, was asked to fill in the PTRQoL instrument while constantly reporting how they reasoned. The resulting interviews and concurrent probing, were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using constant comparison method.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The relation between the measurement and its theoretical underpinning was challenged. Respondents neglected to read the instructions, used response options in an unpredictable way, and varied in their interpretations of the items.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 'think-aloud', retrospective probing and qualitative analysis informed on the validity of the PTRQoL instrument and was valuable in questionnaire development. The study also identified specific problems that could be relevant for other instruments probing patients' medicines-related attitudes and behaviour.

摘要

相似文献

1
Testing the validity of a translated pharmaceutical therapy-related quality of life instrument, using qualitative 'think aloud' methodology.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Jun;33(3):279-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00921.x.
2
Measuring patient satisfaction with diabetes disease state management services in community pharmacy.衡量患者对社区药房糖尿病疾病状态管理服务的满意度。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009 Mar;5(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2008.05.006.
3
Development and evaluation of an instrument to measure parental satisfaction with quality of care in neonatal follow-up.用于测量家长对新生儿随访护理质量满意度的工具的开发与评估
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009 Feb;30(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31819670fa.
4
An evaluation of the validity of inferences made from 3 diabetes assessment instruments: a Rasch analysis.对三种糖尿病评估工具所得推论有效性的评估:一项拉施分析
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008 Mar;4(1):67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.04.002.
5
Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.住院患者所体验到的情感关怀:一种测量工具的开发与测试
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1069-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02586.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
6
A qualitative investigation of school-aged children's answers to items from a generic quality of life measure.
Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Jan;33(1):83-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00665.x.
7
Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO.一种用于测量记录的护理诊断、干预措施和结果质量的工具的开发:质量驱动的护理结果量表(Q-DIO)
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Apr;18(7):1027-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02603.x. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
8
Practice change in community pharmacy: quantification of facilitators.社区药房的实践变革:促进因素的量化
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;42(6):861-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K617. Epub 2008 May 13.
9
Development and evaluation of the quality of life instrument in chronic liver disease patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy.慢性肝病合并轻微肝性脑病患者生活质量量表的研制与评价
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;24(3):408-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05678.x. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
10
The value of cognitive interviewing techniques in palliative care research.认知访谈技术在姑息治疗研究中的价值。
Palliat Med. 2007 Mar;21(2):87-93. doi: 10.1177/0269216306075367.

引用本文的文献

1
Content validation of the COST for patient questionnaire (COPAQ) for patients with low back pain: a qualitative study.COST 患者问卷(COPAQ)用于腰痛患者的内容验证:一项定性研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 5;40(1):e46. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000515.
2
The Arabic medication-related burden quality of life (MRB-QoL) tool: Cross-cultural adaptation and content validation.阿拉伯语药物相关负担生活质量(MRB-QoL)工具:跨文化调适与内容效度验证。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Oct 10;16:100523. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100523. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Health care professional's communication through an interpreter where language barriers exist in neonatal care: a national study.
卫生保健专业人员在新生儿护理中存在语言障碍时通过口译进行沟通:一项全国性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4428-z.
4
A questionnaire measuring staff perceptions of Lean adoption in healthcare: development and psychometric testing.一份衡量医护人员对医疗领域采用精益理念看法的问卷:编制与心理测量测试
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 24;17(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2163-x.
5
Response process and test-retest reliability of the Context Assessment for Community Health tool in Vietnam.越南社区健康背景评估工具的应答过程及重测信度
Glob Health Action. 2016 Jun 10;9:31572. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.31572. eCollection 2016.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the medication taking behavior tool in Thai patients.泰国患者用药行为工具的开发与心理测量测试
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):438-45. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0275-8. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Exploration of the content validity and feasibility of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O and ASCOT in older adults.探索老年人中EQ-5D-3L、ICECAP-O和ASCOT的内容效度及可行性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 15;15:201. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0862-8.
8
Cognitive interviews guide design of a new CAM patient expectations questionnaire.认知访谈指导新 CAM 患者期望问卷的设计。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Jan 25;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-39.
9
Developing a patient-centered outcome measure for complementary and alternative medicine therapies II: refining content validity through cognitive interviews.开发一种针对补充和替代医学疗法的以患者为中心的结局测量工具 II:通过认知访谈完善内容效度。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Dec 29;11:136. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-136.