Clark Amelia, Weymann Alexander, Hartman Eric, Turmelle Yumirle, Carroll Michael, Thurman Joshua M, Holers V Michael, Hourcade Dennis E, Rudnick David A
Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Mol Immunol. 2008 Jun;45(11):3125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 May 1.
Complement signaling has been implicated as important for normal hepatic regeneration. However, the specific mechanism by which complement is activated during liver regeneration remains undefined. To address this question, we investigated the hepatic regenerative response to partial hepatectomy in wildtype mice, C3-, C4-, and factor B-null mice, and C4-null mice treated with a factor B neutralizing antibody (mAb 1379). The results showed that following partial hepatectomy, C3-null mice exhibit reduced hepatic regeneration compared to wildtype mice as assessed by quantification of hepatic cyclin D1 expression and hepatocellular DNA synthesis and mitosis. In contrast, C4-null mice and factor B-null mice demonstrated normal liver regeneration. Moreover, animals in which all of the traditional upstream C3 activation pathways were disrupted, i.e. C4-null mice treated with mAb 1379, exhibited normal C3 activation and hepatocellular proliferation following partial hepatectomy. In order to define candidate non-traditional mechanisms of C3 activation during liver regeneration, plasmin and thrombin were investigated for their abilities to activate C3 in mouse plasma in vitro. The results showed that both proteases are capable of initiating C3 activation, and that plasmin can do so independent of the classical and alternative pathways.
These results show that C3 is required for a normal hepatic regenerative response, but that disruption of the classical- or lectin-dependent pathways (C4-dependent), the alternative pathway (factor B-dependent), or all of these pathways does not impair the hepatic regenerative response, and indicate that non-traditional mechanisms by which C3 is activated during hepatic regeneration must exist. In vitro analysis raises the possibility that plasmin may contribute to non-traditional complement activation during liver regeneration in vivo.
补体信号已被认为对正常肝再生很重要。然而,肝再生过程中补体激活的具体机制仍不明确。为解决这个问题,我们研究了野生型小鼠、C3基因敲除小鼠、C4基因敲除小鼠、因子B基因敲除小鼠以及用因子B中和抗体(单克隆抗体1379)处理的C4基因敲除小鼠对部分肝切除的肝再生反应。结果显示,部分肝切除后,通过定量肝细胞周期蛋白D1表达、肝细胞DNA合成和有丝分裂评估,C3基因敲除小鼠的肝再生能力相较于野生型小鼠有所降低。相比之下,C4基因敲除小鼠和因子B基因敲除小鼠表现出正常的肝再生。此外,所有传统上游C3激活途径均被破坏的动物,即经单克隆抗体1379处理的C4基因敲除小鼠,在部分肝切除后表现出正常的C3激活和肝细胞增殖。为了确定肝再生过程中C3激活的候选非传统机制,研究了纤溶酶和凝血酶在体外激活小鼠血浆中C3的能力。结果表明,这两种蛋白酶都能够启动C3激活,并且纤溶酶可以独立于经典途径和替代途径激活C3。
这些结果表明,C3是正常肝再生反应所必需的,但经典途径或凝集素依赖性途径(C4依赖性)、替代途径(因子B依赖性)或所有这些途径的破坏均不会损害肝再生反应,这表明肝再生过程中必然存在C3激活的非传统机制。体外分析增加了纤溶酶可能在体内肝再生过程中促成非传统补体激活的可能性。