Sánchez María S, Lloyd-Smith James O, Porco Travis C, Williams Brian G, Borgdorff Martien W, Mansoer John, Salomon Joshua A, Getz Wayne M
Department of Environmental Science, policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3114, USA.
AIDS. 2008 May 11;22(8):963-72. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f7cb4b.
The increased risk for tuberculosis in HIV-infected people has fueled a worldwide resurgence of tuberculosis. A major hindrance to controlling tuberculosis is the long treatment duration, leading to default, jeopardizing cure, and generating drug resistance. We investigated how tuberculosis is impacted by reducing treatment duration alone or combined with enhanced case detection and/or cure under different HIV prevalence levels.
Our model includes HIV stages I-IV and was calibrated to long-term tuberculosis and HIV data from Kenya. Benefits were assessed in terms of absolute and relative reductions in new tuberculosis cases and deaths.
Compared with present-day strategies, at 3-20% HIV prevalence we attain a 6-20% decrease in incidence and mortality in 25 years when reducing treatment duration alone; benefits exceed 300% when combined with increased detection and cure. Benefits vary substantially according to HIV status and prevalence. Challenges arise because in absolute terms the number of infected people and deaths increases dramatically with increasing HIV prevalence, and because the relative efficacy of tuberculosis control policies displays a nonlinear pattern whereby they become less effective on a per capita basis at HIV prevalence levels greater than 15%. Benefits of reducing treatment duration may even be reversed at extreme HIV prevalence levels. Benefits of increasing cure versus detection increase as HIV prevalence increases.
Reducing tuberculosis treatment duration, alone or in combination with other control strategies, can provide enormous benefits at high HIV prevalence. Tuberculosis control policies need to account for HIV levels because the efficacy of different interventions varies substantially with HIV prevalence.
HIV感染者患结核病的风险增加,推动了全球结核病疫情的再度流行。控制结核病的一个主要障碍是治疗时间长,这导致患者中断治疗、危及治愈并产生耐药性。我们研究了在不同HIV流行水平下,单独缩短治疗时间或与加强病例发现和/或治愈措施相结合时,结核病会受到怎样的影响。
我们的模型包括HIV的I-IV期,并根据肯尼亚的长期结核病和HIV数据进行了校准。通过新结核病病例和死亡的绝对和相对减少来评估效益。
与当前策略相比,在HIV流行率为3%-20%的情况下,单独缩短治疗时间,25年内发病率和死亡率可降低6%-20%;与增加病例发现和治愈率相结合时,效益超过300%。效益因HIV状态和流行率的不同而有很大差异。出现挑战的原因在于,从绝对数量来看,随着HIV流行率的上升,感染人数和死亡人数会大幅增加,而且结核病控制政策的相对效力呈现出非线性模式,即在HIV流行率高于15%时,人均效力会降低。在极端的HIV流行率水平下,缩短治疗时间的效益甚至可能逆转。随着HIV流行率的增加,提高治愈率相对于增加病例发现率的效益也会增加。
单独或与其他控制策略相结合缩短结核病治疗时间,在高HIV流行率情况下可带来巨大益处。结核病控制政策需要考虑HIV水平,因为不同干预措施的效力会随HIV流行率的变化而有很大差异。