文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

住院癌症患者中基于番泻苷的肠道准备方案使用与不使用多库酯的比较。

A comparison of sennosides-based bowel protocols with and without docusate in hospitalized patients with cancer.

作者信息

Hawley Philippa Helen, Byeon Jai Jun

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2008 May;11(4):575-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0178.


DOI:10.1089/jpm.2007.0178
PMID:18454610
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common and distressing condition in patients with cancer, especially those taking opioid analgesics. Many institutions prevent and treat constipation with titrated laxatives, which is known as a bowel protocol. An effective and well-tolerated bowel protocol is a very important component of cancer care, and there is little evidence on which to base selection of the most appropriate agents. This study compares a protocol of the stimulant laxative sennosides alone with a protocol of sennosides plus the stool softener docusate, in hospitalized patients at an oncology center. The docusate-containing protocol had an initial docusate-only step for patients not taking opioids, and four to six 100-mg capsules of docusate sodium in addition to the sennosides for the rest of the protocol. METHODS: Thirty patients received the sennosides-only (S) protocol and 30 the sennosides plus docusate (DS) protocol. The efficacy and adverse effects of the protocols were monitored for 5-12 days. The two protocols were used sequentially, creating two cohorts, one on each protocol. Eighty percent of patients were taking oral opioids and 72% were admitted for symptom control/supportive care. RESULTS: Over a total of 488 days of observation it was found that the S protocol produced more bowel movements than the DS protocol, and in the symptom control/supportive care patients this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the S group admitted for symptom control/supportive care 62.5% had a bowel movement more than 50% of days, as compared with 32% in those receiving the DS protocol. Fifty-seven percent of the DS group required additional interventions (lactulose, suppositories or enemas) compared to 40% in the S group. Cramps were reported equally by 3 (10%) patients in each group. Eight patients (27%) experienced diarrhea in the S group compared to 4 (13%) in the DS group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the initial docusate-only step and adding docusate 400-600 mg/d to the sennosides did not reduce bowel cramps, and was less effective in inducing laxation than the sennosides-only protocol. Further research into the appropriate use of docusate and into the details of bowel protocol design are required.

摘要

背景:便秘是癌症患者常见且令人苦恼的病症,尤其是那些服用阿片类镇痛药的患者。许多机构使用滴定缓泻剂预防和治疗便秘,这被称为肠道方案。有效的且耐受性良好的肠道方案是癌症护理的一个非常重要的组成部分,而关于选择最合适药物的依据几乎没有证据。本研究在一家肿瘤中心的住院患者中,比较了单独使用刺激性缓泻剂番泻苷的方案与番泻苷加粪便软化剂多库酯的方案。含多库酯的方案对于未服用阿片类药物的患者有一个仅使用多库酯的初始步骤,在方案的其余阶段除了番泻苷外还使用四至六粒100毫克的多库酯钠胶囊。 方法:30例患者接受仅使用番泻苷(S)的方案,30例接受番泻苷加多库酯(DS)的方案。对方案的疗效和不良反应进行5至12天的监测。这两种方案依次使用,形成两个队列,每个队列采用一种方案。80%的患者正在服用口服阿片类药物,72%的患者因症状控制/支持性护理入院。 结果:在总共488天的观察期内发现,S方案比DS方案产生更多的排便次数,并且在症状控制/支持性护理患者中,这种差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在因症状控制/支持性护理入院的S组中,62.5%的患者超过50%的天数有排便,而接受DS方案的患者中这一比例为32%。DS组57%的患者需要额外干预(乳果糖、栓剂或灌肠),而S组为40%。每组各有3例(10%)患者报告有痉挛。S组有8例(27%)患者出现腹泻,而DS组有4例(13%)。 结论:增加仅使用多库酯的初始步骤以及在番泻苷基础上加用400 - 600毫克/天的多库酯并不能减少肠道痉挛,并且在诱导通便方面比仅使用番泻苷的方案效果更差。需要进一步研究多库酯的恰当使用以及肠道方案设计的细节。

相似文献

[1]
A comparison of sennosides-based bowel protocols with and without docusate in hospitalized patients with cancer.

J Palliat Med. 2008-5

[2]
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral docusate in the management of constipation in hospice patients.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012-8-11

[3]
Efficacy and side-effect profiles of lactulose, docusate sodium, and sennosides compared to PEG in opioid-induced constipation: a systematic review.

Can Oncol Nurs J. 2013

[4]
Medication Use Evaluation of Docusate Sodium in Constipation Prophylaxis and Opioid Induced Constipation at the WPB VA HCS Community Living Center.

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024-10

[5]
Missed Opportunity to Deprescribe: Docusate for Constipation in Medical Inpatients.

Am J Med. 2016-9

[6]
An Evaluation of Docusate Monotherapy and the Prevention of Opioid-Induced Constipation after Surgery.

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2022-3

[7]
Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Docusate Sodium Compared With Docusate Sodium Alone After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016-9

[8]
Effect of an electronic medical record design modification on laxative co-prescribing among hospitalised patients taking opioids: A before-and-after study.

Int J Med Inform. 2020-5-15

[9]
The use of senna with docusate for postoperative constipation after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010-3-6

[10]
The efficacy of docusate sodium and senna glycoside for the treatment of constipation after rotator cuff repair: A randomized controlled study.

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021-2-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effects of a Revision to the Standard Admission Order Set on Laxative Prescribing for Opioid-Induced Constipation.

J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024-11-4

[2]
Effect of Court-Type Thai Traditional Massage Versus Senokot Treatment on Chronic Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Evid Based Integr Med. 2020

[3]
Opioid-Induced Constipation in Oncological Patients: New Strategies of Management.

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019-12-19

[4]
PEG vs. sennosides for opioid-induced constipation in cancer care.

Support Care Cancer. 2019-7-18

[5]
Managing Constipation in Adults With Cancer.

J Adv Pract Oncol. 2017-3

[6]
Palliative Care and Symptom Management in Older Patients with Cancer.

Clin Geriatr Med. 2016-2

[7]
Role of supportive care for terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014-8

[8]
Update in hospital palliative care.

J Hosp Med. 2013-12

[9]
Adult cancer pain.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013-8

[10]
[Is the pharmacological treatment of constipation in palliative care evidence based? : a systematic literature review].

Schmerz. 2012-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索