Yamamiya Kanoko, Okuda Kazuhiro, Kawase Tomoyuki, Hata Ken-Ichiro, Wolff Larry F, Yoshie Hiromasa
Division of Periodontology, Department of Oral Biological Science, Course for Oral Life Science, Institute of Medicine and Dentistry, Niigata University, 52374 Chuo-ku, Gakkocho-dori 2-bancho, Niigata, Japan.
J Periodontol. 2008 May;79(5):811-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070518.
The aim of the present controlled clinical study was to compare the clinical response of human cultured periosteum (HCP) sheets in combination with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and porous hydroxyapatite (HA) granules to a mixture of PRP and HA in the treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects.
Thirty interproximal infrabony osseous defects in 30 healthy, non-smoking subjects diagnosed with chronic periodontitis were included in this study. The subjects were randomly assigned to the test group (HCP sheets combined with PRP and HA) or the control group (PRP with HA). Clinical and radiographic measurements were made at baseline and the 12-month post-surgical evaluation.
Compared to baseline, the 12-month results indicated that both treatment modalities resulted in statistically significant changes (P <0.01) in the gingival index, bleeding on probing, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and radiographic infrabony defect depth. Compared to the control group, the test group exhibited a statistically significantly more favorable change in clinical attachment gain (3.9 +/- 1.6 mm versus 2.7 +/- 1.3 mm; P <0.05), vertical relative attachment gain (83.5% +/- 31.7% versus 55.0% +/- 21.9%; P <0.05), and radiographic infrabony defect fill (4.9 +/- 1.2 mm versus 3.2 +/- 1.1 mm; P <0.01).
Compared to PRP with HA, treatment with a combination of HCP sheets, PRP, and HA led to a significantly more favorable clinical improvement in infrabony periodontal defects. A factor likely contributing to these favorable clinical results is the presence of osteogenic cells in the HCP sheets, which provided greater regeneration potential.
本对照临床研究的目的是比较人培养骨膜(HCP)片联合富血小板血浆(PRP)和多孔羟基磷灰石(HA)颗粒与PRP和HA混合物在治疗人类骨下袋牙周缺损中的临床反应。
本研究纳入了30名被诊断为慢性牙周炎的健康、不吸烟受试者的30个邻间骨下袋骨缺损。受试者被随机分配到试验组(HCP片联合PRP和HA)或对照组(PRP与HA)。在基线和术后12个月评估时进行临床和影像学测量。
与基线相比,12个月的结果表明,两种治疗方式在牙龈指数、探诊出血、探诊深度、临床附着水平和影像学骨下袋缺损深度方面均产生了具有统计学意义的变化(P<0.01)。与对照组相比,试验组在临床附着增加(3.9±1.6mm对2.7±1.3mm;P<0.05)、垂直相对附着增加(83.5%±31.7%对55.0%±21.9%;P<0.05)和影像学骨下袋缺损填充(4.9±1.2mm对3.2±1.1mm;P<0.01)方面表现出具有统计学意义的更有利变化。
与PRP联合HA相比,HCP片、PRP和HA联合治疗在骨下袋牙周缺损方面导致了明显更有利的临床改善。这些有利临床结果的一个可能促成因素是HCP片中存在成骨细胞,其提供了更大的再生潜力。