Doratotaj Shirin, Macknin Michael L, Worley Sarah
Department of General Pediatrics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 2008 May;36(4):301-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.019.
Although influenza is the leading infections cause of death in the United States, only 40% of health care workers (HCW) comply with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation for routine influenza vaccination.
This study investigated a novel approach for improving influenza vaccination rates among HCW. Eight hundred employees we selected, 200 each from the following 4 categories: professional staff, resident physicians, registered nurses, and licensed practical nurses. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive (1) no intervention, (2) a letter explaining the importance of influenza vaccine for HCW, (3) a ticket activated with influenza vaccine administration for a raffle of a free Caribbean vacation for 2, or (4) both the educational letter and the raffle ticket. We compared the proportion of employees receiving vaccination and participating in the raffle across groups.
The influenza vaccination rate for all study subjects was 41%. The number of subjects receiving vaccine did not differ by occupation (P = .87) or intervention group (P = .66).
This study provides no evidence to support the use of mailed educational letters or a single large raffle prize incentive as a means to boost hospital employee influenza vaccination rates.
尽管流感是美国主要的感染性死亡原因,但只有40%的医护人员(HCW)遵守疾病控制与预防中心关于常规流感疫苗接种的建议。
本研究调查了一种提高医护人员流感疫苗接种率的新方法。我们选取了800名员工,分别来自以下4类,每类200人:专业人员、住院医师、注册护士和执业护士。受试者被随机分配接受(1)无干预,(2)一封解释流感疫苗对医护人员重要性的信,(3)一张用于抽奖的券,抽奖奖品为两人免费加勒比海度假,该券在接种流感疫苗后激活,或(4)教育信和抽奖券。我们比较了各组中接种疫苗和参与抽奖的员工比例。
所有研究受试者的流感疫苗接种率为41%。接种疫苗的受试者数量在职业(P = 0.87)或干预组(P = 0.66)之间没有差异。
本研究没有提供证据支持使用邮寄教育信或单一的大奖激励作为提高医院员工流感疫苗接种率的手段。