Suppr超能文献

同心针单纤维肌电图:拇长伸肌自主激活与刺激时的比较性颤抖

Concentric needle single fiber electromyography: comparative jitter on voluntary-activated and stimulated Extensor Digitorum Communis.

作者信息

Kouyoumdjian João Aris, Stålberg Erik V

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;119(7):1614-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the jitter values in voluntarily activated (v-CNE) and stimulated (s-CNE) techniques for Extensor Digitorum Communis muscle using a disposable concentric needle electrode (CNE). Quantifying jitter using a CNE in conjunction with a stimulated technique has not been reported previously.

METHODS

Forty-one normal subjects were studied, 15 male and 26 female with a mean age of 34.1+/-10.7 years (19-55). The jitter values were expressed as the mean consecutive difference (MCD) of 20 analyzed potential pairs using v-CNE and 30 isolated potentials using s-CNE.

RESULTS

The mean MCD (n=41) was 23.0+/-2.8 micros for v-CNE and 18.2+/-2.2 micros for s-CNE. The mean jitter of all recorded potentials was 22.9+/-6.7 micros for v-CNE (n=820) and 18.3+/-5.2 micros for s-CNE (n=1230). Upper limits for the 18th (v-CNE) and 27th highest (s-CNE) MCD were 38.9 and 30 micros, respectively (95% confidence limit). The jitter decrease in s-CNE compared to v-CNE was 1:0.79.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings of the jitter values using CNE were similar to other published reports using the voluntarily activated technique; however, these are the first described for the stimulated technique using CNE.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study confirms that CNE can be used for the stimulated jitter acquisition and measurement, although certain precautions must be taken regarding signal quality, e.g., observing minimal summation.

摘要

目的

使用一次性同心针电极(CNE)比较指总伸肌在自主激活(v-CNE)和刺激(s-CNE)技术下的颤抖值。此前尚未有关于使用CNE结合刺激技术来量化颤抖的报道。

方法

对41名正常受试者进行研究,其中15名男性和26名女性,平均年龄为34.1±10.7岁(19 - 55岁)。颤抖值表示为使用v-CNE时20对分析电位的平均连续差值(MCD)以及使用s-CNE时30个孤立电位的平均连续差值。

结果

v-CNE的平均MCD(n = 41)为23.0±2.8微秒,s-CNE为18.2±2.2微秒。所有记录电位的平均颤抖,v-CNE(n = 820)为22.9±6.7微秒,s-CNE(n = 1230)为18.3±5.2微秒。第18高(v-CNE)和第27高(s-CNE)MCD的上限分别为38.9和30微秒(95%置信限)。与v-CNE相比,s-CNE的颤抖降低比例为1:0.79。

结论

我们使用CNE得出的颤抖值结果与其他使用自主激活技术发表的报告相似;然而,这些是首次描述使用CNE的刺激技术的结果。

意义

本研究证实CNE可用于刺激颤抖的采集和测量,尽管在信号质量方面必须采取某些预防措施,例如观察最小总和。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验