Suppr超能文献

同心针电极和单纤维针电极在重症肌无力中产生的颤抖结果相当。

Concentric and single fiber needle electrodes yield comparable jitter results in myasthenia gravis.

作者信息

Farrugia Maria E, Weir Andrew I, Cleary Marie, Cooper Sarah, Metcalfe Richard, Mallik Arup

机构信息

Neurology Department, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2009 May;39(5):579-85. doi: 10.1002/mus.21151.

Abstract

The single fiber needle electrode (SFNE), which is designed to isolate single muscle fiber action potentials, has played an important role in the diagnosis of myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the concentric needle electrode (CNE) has been recently adopted by some workers to study neuromuscular instability in MG, and reference data have also been obtained in healthy subjects. In this study we wanted to establish whether data acquired using the SFNE is comparable to that obtained using the CNE when studying patients with MG. We established reference data for our laboratory using the CNE for orbicularis oculi (OO) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). We compared data from 24 MG patients using both SFNE and CNE and found no significant differences in mean jitter values for either muscles. We correlated the neurophysiological data obtained by either electrode with various clinical assessments, the ice pack test, OO and EDC strength measurement, and MGFA classification of disease, and we found no significant relation. We compared discomfort scores for the two needle electrodes for each muscle and found that the discomfort scores for CNE are significantly lower (P = 0.0004). We conclude that the CNE is a useful alternative electrode for studying single fiber potentials, but more reference data from normal control subjects is desirable. Muscle Nerve, 2008.

摘要

单纤维针电极(SFNE)旨在分离单根肌纤维动作电位,在重症肌无力(MG)的诊断中发挥了重要作用。然而,最近一些研究人员采用同心针电极(CNE)来研究MG患者的神经肌肉不稳定性,并且也获得了健康受试者的参考数据。在本研究中,我们想确定在研究MG患者时,使用SFNE获取的数据是否与使用CNE获得的数据具有可比性。我们使用CNE为眼轮匝肌(OO)和指总伸肌(EDC)建立了本实验室的参考数据。我们比较了24例MG患者使用SFNE和CNE的数据,发现两块肌肉的平均颤抖值均无显著差异。我们将两种电极获得的神经生理学数据与各种临床评估、冰敷试验、OO和EDC肌力测量以及MGFA疾病分类进行了关联,未发现显著相关性。我们比较了每块肌肉两种针电极的不适评分,发现CNE的不适评分显著更低(P = 0.0004)。我们得出结论,CNE是研究单纤维电位的一种有用的替代电极,但需要更多来自正常对照受试者的参考数据。《肌肉与神经》,2008年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验