Molyneux Sassy, Geissler P Wenzel
KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories, Social Behavioural Research group, P.O. Box 230, District Hospital Grounds, Kilifi, Kenya.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Sep;67(5):685-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.023. Epub 2008 May 2.
The ethics of medical research have grown as an area of expertise and debate in recent years, with two broad approaches emerging in relation to transnational research: (1) the refinement of guidelines and strengthening of review, processes primarily to protect the right of individual research participants and strengthen interpersonal relations at the micro-level; and (2) considering more centrally, as crucial ethical concerns, the wider interests of whole populations, the functioning of research institutions, the processes of collaboration, and the ethics of inequitable international relations. We see the two areas of debate and action as complementary, and believe that social science conducted in and around transnational medical research environments can bring these two perspectives together in a more 'situated ethics' of research. To explore this idea for medical research in Africa, we organized a conference in December 2005 in Kilifi, Kenya. In this introduction we outline the two emerging approaches to medical ethics, summarise each of seven papers selected from the conference for inclusion in this special issue on ethics and ethnography, and finally highlight two areas of lively debate at the conference itself: the appropriateness and value of ethics guidelines and review boards for medical research; and the ethical review of social science research. Together, the papers and debates point to the importance of focusing on the ethics of relationships and on justice in both biomedicine and social science research, and on giving greater voice and visibility to the field staff who often play a crucial and under-supported role in 'doing ethics' in the field. They also point to the potential value of social science research on the range of relationships operating at different levels and time scales in medical research, including those surrounding community engagement activities, and the role and functioning of ethics review boards. We conclude by highlighting the ethical priority of capacity strengthening in medical research, social science and research ethics in Africa to ensure that local and national priorities and concerns are considered at both the micro and macro levels.
近年来,医学研究伦理已发展成为一个专业领域和辩论焦点,在跨国研究方面出现了两种主要方法:(1)完善准则并加强审查程序,主要目的是保护个体研究参与者的权利,并在微观层面加强人际关系;(2)更集中地将整个人口的更广泛利益、研究机构的运作、合作过程以及不平等国际关系的伦理作为关键的伦理问题加以考虑。我们认为这两个辩论和行动领域是相辅相成的,并相信在跨国医学研究环境及其周边开展的社会科学研究能够以更具“情境性的研究伦理”将这两种观点结合起来。为了探讨非洲医学研究中的这一理念,我们于2005年12月在肯尼亚基利菲组织了一次会议。在本引言中,我们概述了医学伦理的两种新出现的方法,总结了从会议中选出的七篇论文中的每一篇,这些论文被收录在本期关于伦理与民族志的特刊中,最后突出会议本身的两个热烈辩论领域:医学研究伦理准则和审查委员会的适当性与价值;以及社会科学研究的伦理审查。这些论文和辩论共同指出,在生物医学和社会科学研究中关注关系伦理和正义,以及让实地工作人员有更大的发言权和能见度的重要性,实地工作人员在实地“践行伦理”方面往往发挥着关键但未得到充分支持的作用。它们还指出了社会科学研究对于医学研究中不同层面和时间尺度上各种关系运作的潜在价值,包括围绕社区参与活动的关系,以及伦理审查委员会的作用和运作。我们最后强调在非洲加强医学研究、社会科学和研究伦理能力的伦理优先性,以确保在微观和宏观层面都考虑到地方和国家的优先事项及关切。