• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中风后吞咽困难的治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价

Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Foley Norine, Teasell Robert, Salter Katherine, Kruger Elizabeth, Martino Rosemary

机构信息

Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Hospital, Rm B-3019b, 801 Commissioner's Rd. E. London, ON N6C 5J1, Canada.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2008 May;37(3):258-64. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn064.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afn064
PMID:18456790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

dysphagia is common following stroke and is associated with the development of pneumonia. Many dysphagia treatment options are available, some still experimental and others already rooted in common practice. Previous reviews of these treatments were limited due to a dearth of available studies. Recently, more trials have been published warranting a re-examination of the evidence.

OBJECTIVE

a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), updating previous work and evaluating a broader range of therapeutic interventions intended for use in adults recovering from stroke and dysphagia.

METHODS

using multiple databases, we identified RCTs published between the years 1966 and August 2007 examining the efficacy of dysphagia therapies following stroke. Across studies, results of similar treatments and outcomes were compared and evaluated.

RESULTS

fifteen articles were retrieved assessing a broad range of treatments that included texture-modified diets, general dysphagia therapy programmes, non-oral (enteral) feeding, medications, and physical and olfactory stimulation. Across the studies there was heterogeneity of the treatments evaluated and the outcomes assessed that precluded the use of pooled analyses. Descriptively these findings present emerging evidence that nasogastric tube feeding is not associated with a higher risk of death compared to percutaneous feeding tubes; and general dysphagia therapy programmes are associated with a reduced risk of pneumonia in the acute stage of stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

dysphagia is known to be a common and potentially serious complication of stroke. Despite the recent newly published RCTs, few utilise the same treatment and outcomes thereby limiting the evidence to support the medical effectiveness of common dysphagia treatments used for patients recovering from stroke.

摘要

背景

吞咽困难在中风后很常见,且与肺炎的发生有关。有多种吞咽困难治疗方案可供选择,有些仍处于实验阶段,其他一些则已成为常规做法。由于可用研究匮乏,以往对这些治疗方法的综述受到限制。最近,更多试验已发表,有必要重新审视相关证据。

目的

对所有随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统综述,更新以往工作,并评估一系列更广泛的治疗干预措施,这些措施旨在用于中风后吞咽困难的成年康复患者。

方法

我们使用多个数据库,识别1966年至2007年8月期间发表的RCT,这些RCT研究了中风后吞咽困难治疗的疗效。在各项研究中,对相似治疗方法和结果进行了比较和评估。

结果

检索到15篇文章,评估了广泛的治疗方法,包括质地改良饮食、一般吞咽困难治疗方案、非经口(肠内)喂养、药物以及物理和嗅觉刺激。在各项研究中,所评估的治疗方法和所评估的结果存在异质性,这使得无法进行汇总分析。从描述性角度来看,这些发现表明有新证据显示,与经皮喂食管相比,鼻胃管喂养与更高的死亡风险无关;一般吞咽困难治疗方案与中风急性期肺炎风险降低有关。

结论

已知吞咽困难是中风常见且可能严重的并发症。尽管最近有新发表的RCT,但很少有研究采用相同的治疗方法和结果,因此限制了支持用于中风康复患者的常见吞咽困难治疗方法医学有效性的证据。

相似文献

1
Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.中风后吞咽困难的治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价
Age Ageing. 2008 May;37(3):258-64. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn064.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Enteral tube feeding for people with severe dementia.经口肠内营养管饲用于重度痴呆患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 13;8(8):CD013503. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013503.pub2.
5
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
6
Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.早期和极早期肝细胞癌的消融和非手术治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(29):1-172. doi: 10.3310/GK5221.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.成人慢性疼痛的体力活动与锻炼:Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 14;1(1):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub2.
9
Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.成人慢性疼痛的体力活动与锻炼:Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 24;4(4):CD011279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011279.pub3.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative nomogram for predictive risk stratification of aspiration pneumonia in post-stroke dysphagia patients.用于中风后吞咽困难患者吸入性肺炎预测风险分层的创新列线图。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 3;16:1556541. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1556541. eCollection 2025.
2
A systematic review on dysphagia treatments for persons living with dementia.一项关于痴呆症患者吞咽困难治疗方法的系统评价。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Dec;15(6):1573-1585. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01107-6. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Evidence for Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dysphagia after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
间歇性theta爆发式经颅磁刺激治疗中风后吞咽困难的证据:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dysphagia. 2025 Feb;40(1):54-65. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10729-8. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
Fiberoptic Endoscopy Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) Findings Associated with High Pneumonia Risk in a Cohort of Patients at Risk of Dysphagia.吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估(FEES)结果与一组吞咽困难风险患者的高肺炎风险相关。
Dysphagia. 2025 Feb;40(1):282-291. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10727-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
5
Evidence and Recommendations for Acute Stroke Rehabilitation from the Japan Stroke Society: Abridged Secondary Publication of the Japanese-language Version.日本卒中学会急性卒中康复的证据与建议:日文版节略二次出版物
Prog Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr 24;9:20240015. doi: 10.2490/prm.20240015. eCollection 2024.
6
The use of color-changeable chewing gum in evaluating food masticability.变色口香糖在评价食物可咀嚼性中的应用。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Apr;15(2):497-504. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00916-5. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Speech Language Pathology interventions in the areas of breathing, chewing, swallowing and speaking: a scoping review.言语病理学在呼吸、咀嚼、吞咽和言语方面的干预措施:范围综述。
Codas. 2023 Dec 18;36(2):e20220339. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022339pt. eCollection 2023.
8
Hydration and nutrition care practices in stroke: findings from the UK and Australia.中风患者的水化与营养护理实践:英国和澳大利亚的研究结果
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01575-4.
9
Perioperative Stroke and Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission After Cardiac Surgeries: State Inpatient Database Study.心脏手术后围手术期卒中与30天再入院:州住院患者数据库研究
J Clin Med Res. 2022 Jan;14(1):34-44. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4647. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
10
Behavioural Interventions in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials.口咽吞咽困难患者的行为干预:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 28;11(3):685. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030685.