Bharucha Ashok J, Vasilescu Mihnea, Dew Mary Amanda, Begley Amy, Stevens Scott, Degenholtz Howard, Wactlar Howard
Advanced Center in Interventions and Services Research for Late-Life Mood Disorders and the John A. Hartford Center of Excellence in Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008 May;9(4):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.08.005. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
To examine the total and domain-specific prevalence of verbally and physically abusive, socially inappropriate, and care-resistive behaviors according to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) compared with research instruments in nursing home residents with severe dementia.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND METHODS: As part of a longitudinal observational study, MDS behavioral symptoms data were compared with corresponding items from the Ryden Aggression Scale and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory for 15 nursing home residents with severe dementia. McNemar's test was used to compare the difference in the proportion of subjects who experienced any symptoms, as well as specific symptoms in several domains, according to the MDS and the research instruments. Additionally, temporal fluctuations in behavioral symptoms were descriptively and graphically summarized.
The MDS significantly underestimated both the total proportion of subjects experiencing any behavioral symptoms (P = .016), as well as the proportion of subjects experiencing verbally abusive symptoms (P < .002), physically abusive symptoms (P = .008), or socially inappropriate behaviors (P = .016) compared with corresponding items from the research instruments. Moreover, these behaviors exhibited considerable temporal instability, suggesting that the systematic daily collection of measures of behavioral disturbances is imperative during the week in which the MDS assessment is to be completed.
Albeit from a small study sample, our findings call into question the validity of the MDS behavioral symptom items as they are currently recorded, and suggest that a simple intervention of twice daily completion of a behavioral symptoms checklist containing the MDS items during the week of the assessment may significantly improve the accuracy of the recorded data.
根据最小数据集(MDS),研究重度痴呆养老院居民中言语和身体虐待、社交不当及抗拒护理行为的总体及特定领域患病率,并与研究工具进行比较。
设计、地点和方法:作为纵向观察性研究的一部分,将15名重度痴呆养老院居民的MDS行为症状数据与Ryden攻击量表及科恩-曼斯菲尔德激越量表的相应项目进行比较。采用McNemar检验,比较根据MDS和研究工具出现任何症状以及几个领域特定症状的受试者比例差异。此外,对行为症状的时间波动进行了描述性和图表总结。
与研究工具的相应项目相比,MDS显著低估了出现任何行为症状的受试者总比例(P = 0.016),以及出现言语虐待症状(P < 0.002)、身体虐待症状(P = 0.008)或社交不当行为(P = 0.016)的受试者比例。此外,这些行为表现出相当大的时间不稳定性,这表明在完成MDS评估的那一周,必须系统地每日收集行为障碍测量数据。
尽管研究样本较小,但我们的研究结果对目前记录的MDS行为症状项目的有效性提出了质疑,并表明在评估周内每天两次完成包含MDS项目的行为症状清单这一简单干预措施可能会显著提高记录数据的准确性。