Jones Graham R D, Barker Antony, Tate Jill, Lim Chen-Fee, Robertson Ken
Department of Chemical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Biochem Rev. 2004 May;25(2):99-104.
The current paradigm for pathology reference intervals is for each laboratory to determine its own interval for use with each test offered by the laboratory. It is our contention that this approach does not best serve the medical community, especially at a time when electronic databases of health information are being expanded and integrated. We also believe that this approach is not performed well in many laboratories and is excessively expensive in practice. In contrast, we believe that the preferable option is to develop and apply common reference intervals throughout Australia and New Zealand, together with common reporting formats and assay standardisation wherever this is possible. We are aware that these are neither trivial nor simple issues, however we believe that failure to achieve this goal where technically possible will be a failure of the pathology profession to meet the challenges of the modern health community.
当前病理学参考区间的模式是每个实验室为其提供的每项检测确定自己的区间。我们认为这种方法并不能最好地服务于医学界,尤其是在健康信息电子数据库不断扩展和整合的时代。我们还认为这种方法在许多实验室中执行效果不佳,且在实践中成本过高。相比之下,我们认为更好的选择是在澳大利亚和新西兰制定并应用通用的参考区间,同时尽可能采用通用的报告格式和检测标准化。我们意识到这些问题既非微不足道也不简单,然而我们认为,在技术可行的情况下未能实现这一目标将是病理学专业未能应对现代健康领域挑战的表现。