Hughes David, Doery James Cg, Choy Kay Weng, Flatman Robert
ACT Pathology, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Department of Pathology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Vic., Australia;; Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
Clin Biochem Rev. 2016 Aug;37(3):131-134.
In clinical chemistry, harmonisation of the testing process is a global initiative with the purpose of improving patient safety, allowing better integration of research data and enabling the use of national electronic heath records. In Australia, as in other countries, the initial focus has been on the harmonisation of the more commonly measured analytes. There are also a number of calculated parameters, derived from these measured analytes, which could also be considered for harmonisation. Calculated parameters that are reported by laboratories and used for clinical decision-making should undergo the same robust process of harmonisation as is the case for the measured analytes. Aspects that should be considered for harmonisation are: terminology, the formulae used and where possible the use of common reference intervals. To investigate pathways towards the harmonisation of calculated parameters, three commonly reported parameters are considered. Calculated osmolality, the anion gap and albumin-adjusted calcium are all derived from common analytes which have individually been considered for harmonisation. They present different methodological, measurement uncertainty and terminological hurdles to harmonisation and are likely to require different pathways and solutions.
在临床化学领域,检测过程的协调统一是一项全球性举措,旨在提高患者安全性、促进研究数据的更好整合以及推动国家电子健康记录的使用。在澳大利亚,与其他国家一样,最初的重点一直是更常见检测分析物的协调统一。此外,还有一些从这些检测分析物得出的计算参数,也可考虑进行协调统一。实验室报告并用于临床决策的计算参数,应像检测分析物那样经历同样严格的协调统一过程。协调统一应考虑的方面包括:术语、所用公式以及在可能的情况下使用通用参考区间。为研究计算参数协调统一的途径,我们考虑了三个常见报告参数。计算渗透压、阴离子间隙和白蛋白校正钙均源自已分别考虑进行协调统一的常见分析物。它们在协调统一方面呈现出不同的方法学、测量不确定度和术语障碍,可能需要不同的途径和解决方案。