Traclet Alan, Rascle Olivier, Souchon Nicolas, Coulomb-Cabagno Genevieve, Dosseville Fabrice
UFRSTAPS, Université de Caen Basse Normandie, France.
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Feb;106(1):234-40. doi: 10.2466/pms.106.1.234-240.
The purpose of this role-playing study was to explore the perceived legitimacy of aggression in soccer as a function of perspective-related differences (aggressor vs victim) and type of aggression (instrumental vs hostile). 120 soccer players watched videotaped aggressive interactions in soccer and took the perspective of the actors (aggressor then victim or the reverse). Then they rated the legitimacy of each aggressive behavior depending on its ultimate goal (instrumental then hostile or the reverse). When participants adopted the aggressor perspective, they perceived instrumental aggression as more legitimate than hostile aggression. In contrast, when participants took the perspective of the victim, no significant difference was found regardless of the type of aggression. The discussion focussed on implications and consequences of such divergences in aggressive sport situations.
这项角色扮演研究的目的是探讨足球运动中攻击行为的感知合法性，该合法性是视角相关差异（攻击者与受害者）和攻击类型（工具性攻击与敌意性攻击）的函数。120名足球运动员观看了足球比赛中攻击性互动的录像，并从参与者（先攻击者后受害者或相反顺序）的视角进行观察。然后，他们根据每种攻击行为的最终目标（先工具性攻击后敌意性攻击或相反顺序）对其合法性进行评分。当参与者采用攻击者视角时，他们认为工具性攻击比敌意性攻击更具合法性。相比之下，当参与者采用受害者视角时，无论攻击类型如何，均未发现显著差异。讨论集中在这种攻击性运动情境差异的影响和后果上。
