• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术后改良Gleason分级与前列腺癌pT分期的相关性

Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Helpap Burkhard, Egevad Lars

机构信息

Department of Pathology, General Hospital HBH Kliniken Singen, Academic Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Singen, Germany.

出版信息

Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2008 Feb;30(1):1-7.

PMID:18459581
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation between modified Gleason score (GS) and pT stage of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

STUDY DESIGN

Six hundred forty-nine consecutive RP specimens were graded according to the conventional and the modified Gleason grading systems.

RESULTS

A total of 29% of the tumors were upgraded. Both variants of GS correlated with pathologic stage. Stage pT2 tumors were assigned a GS of 3-6 less often with modified grading than with conventional grading (29% and 84%, respectively). The only significant difference of stage distribution between conventional and modified GS was for GS 7, where pT2 was the most common stage with modified grading (54%) and pT3 was most common with conventional grading (67%). Of GS 3 + 4 = 7a tumors, 95% were stage pT2, while 79% of GS 4 + 3 = 7b tumors were stage pT3-4.

CONCLUSION

The stage distribution of modified GSs of RP specimens differs from that of conventional GSs, but a good correlation exists between grade and pT stage. Notably, GS 4 + 3 = 7b was more often associated with high stage than was GS 3 + 4 = 7a.

摘要

目的

研究改良Gleason评分(GS)与前列腺癌根治术(RP)标本的pT分期之间的相关性。

研究设计

根据传统和改良Gleason分级系统对649例连续的RP标本进行分级。

结果

共有29%的肿瘤分级上调。两种GS变体均与病理分期相关。pT2期肿瘤采用改良分级时被赋予3 - 6分的GS的频率低于传统分级(分别为29%和84%)。传统和改良GS之间分期分布的唯一显著差异在于GS 7,改良分级时pT2是最常见分期(54%),传统分级时pT3是最常见分期(67%)。在GS 3 + 4 = 7a的肿瘤中,95%为pT2期,而GS 4 + 3 = 7b的肿瘤中79%为pT3 - 4期。

结论

RP标本改良GS的分期分布与传统GS不同,但分级与pT分期之间存在良好的相关性。值得注意的是,与GS 3 + 4 = 7a相比,GS 4 + 3 = 7b更常与高分期相关。

相似文献

1
Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后改良Gleason分级与前列腺癌pT分期的相关性
Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2008 Feb;30(1):1-7.
2
The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.改良Gleason分级在前列腺癌活检及根治性前列腺切除标本中的意义。
Virchows Arch. 2006 Dec;449(6):622-7. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0310-6. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
3
Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.前列腺穿刺活检中格里森评分 3+4=7(最低格里森评分 4 成分极少)的前列腺癌与根治性前列腺切除术后标本中低危肿瘤相关。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Aug;38(8):1096-101. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000235.
4
Biopsy characteristics in men with a preoperative diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma with high Gleason score (8-10) predict pathologic outcome in radical prostatectomy.术前诊断为高Gleason评分(8 - 10)的前列腺腺癌男性患者的活检特征可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的病理结果。
Hum Pathol. 2014 Oct;45(10):2006-13. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
5
The relative mRNA expression levels of matrix metalloproteinase to E-cadherin in prostate biopsy specimens distinguishes organ-confined from advanced prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.前列腺活检标本中基质金属蛋白酶与E-钙黏蛋白的相对mRNA表达水平可区分根治性前列腺切除术中局限于器官的前列腺癌与晚期前列腺癌。
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jun;9(6):2185-94.
6
The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.准确测定Gleason评分对前列腺癌治疗方案及预后的意义
Pathol Oncol Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/s12253-015-0013-x. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.活检Gleason评分7中的主要Gleason模式可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的不良组织病理学特征和生化复发。
Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):168-76. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.821628. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
8
Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.在根治性前列腺切除术中,Gleason评分≤7(包括三级5级模式)的患者发生区域淋巴结转移的可能性。
BJU Int. 2017 Jun;119(6):872-878. doi: 10.1111/bju.13623. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
9
Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.前列腺癌分级:对前列腺穿刺活检 Gleason 评分 4+3 进行分层为高级别或中级别分组的影响。
BJU Int. 2010 Mar;105(5):631-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08810.x. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
10
Significance of Gleason grading of low-grade carcinoma of the prostate with therapeutic option of active surveillance.前列腺低级别癌Gleason分级的意义及主动监测的治疗选择
Urol Int. 2013;90(1):17-23. doi: 10.1159/000342810. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma.世界卫生组织2016年前列腺癌新 Gleason 评分的验证
Urol Ann. 2018 Jul-Sep;10(3):324-329. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_185_17.
2
The evolving Gleason grading system.不断发展的格里森分级系统。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Feb;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.02.04.
3
Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.提高前列腺癌小病灶格里森评分的可重复性——腺体融合诊断标准的建议。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2012 Jul;18(3):615-21. doi: 10.1007/s12253-011-9484-6. Epub 2011 Dec 17.
4
Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system.在格里森分级系统中改变定义的临床意义。
Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Mar;7(3):136-42. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.9. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
5
[Clinical insignificance of prostate cancer: are there morphological findings?].[前列腺癌的临床无意义:是否存在形态学发现?]
Urologe A. 2009 Feb;48(2):170-4. doi: 10.1007/s00120-008-1867-2.