Center for the Health Professions & School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 1):1674-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00850.x. Epub 2008 May 5.
To compare alternative measures of nurse staffing and assess the relative strengths and limitations of each measure.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary and secondary data from 2000 and 2002 on hospital nurse staffing from the American Hospital Association, California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, California Nursing Outcomes Coalition, and the California Workforce Initiative Survey.
Hospital-level and unit-level data were compared using summary statistics, t-tests, and correlations.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data sources were matched for each hospital. When possible, hospital units or types of units were matched within each hospital. Productive nursing hours and direct patient care hours were converted to full-time equivalent employment and to nurse-to-patient ratios to compare nurse staffing as measured by different surveys.
The greatest differences in staffing measurement arise when unit-level data are compared with hospital-level aggregated data reported in large administrative databases. There is greater dispersion in the data obtained from publicly available, administrative data sources than in unit-level data; however, the unit-level data sources are limited to a select set of hospitals and are not available to many researchers.
Unit-level data collection may be more precise. Differences between databases may account for differences in research findings.
比较护士人力配置的替代措施,并评估每种措施的相对优势和局限性。
资料来源/研究场所:2000 年和 2002 年美国医院协会、加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室、加利福尼亚护理结果联盟和加利福尼亚劳动力倡议调查的主要和次要数据,这些数据来自医院护士人力配置。
使用汇总统计、t 检验和相关性比较医院层面和单位层面的数据。
资料收集/提取方法:为每个医院匹配数据源。在可能的情况下,在每个医院内匹配医院单位或单位类型。将生产性护理小时数和直接护理患者小时数转换为全职等效就业人数和护士与患者比例,以比较不同调查衡量的护士人力配置。
当将单位层面的数据与大型管理数据库中报告的医院层面汇总数据进行比较时,人员配备测量的最大差异就会出现。从公开的行政数据源中获得的数据比单位层面的数据分散程度更大;但是,单位层面的数据来源仅限于一组选定的医院,许多研究人员无法获得。
单位层面的数据收集可能更准确。数据库之间的差异可能是研究结果差异的原因。