Suppr超能文献

在综合性癌症中心姑息治疗病房中使用姑息性镇静治疗难治性症状。

Use of palliative sedation for intractable symptoms in the palliative care unit of a comprehensive cancer center.

作者信息

Elsayem Ahmed, Curry Iii Eardie, Boohene Jeanette, Munsell Mark F, Calderon Bianca, Hung Frank, Bruera Eduardo

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, Unit 8, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2009 Jan;17(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0459-4. Epub 2008 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is wide variation in the frequency of reported use of palliative sedation (PS) to control intractable and refractory symptoms in terminally ill patients. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and outcomes of PS use and examine patterns of practice after establishment of a policy for the administration of midazolam for PS in our palliative care unit (PCU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed PCU admissions for 2004 and 2005 and pharmacy records to identify patients who received chlorpromazine, lorazepam, or midazolam for PS in the PCU. Data on indication for PS, drug used, and discharge outcome were assessed for each patient.

RESULTS

During the period studied, there were 1,207 PCU admissions. Of these patients, 186 (15%) received PS; and 143 (41%) of the 352 patients who died in the PCU received PS. The median age of PS patients was 58 (range, 20-84) years, and 106 (57%) were male. The most common indications for PS were delirium, 153 cases (82%); dyspnea, 11 (6%); and multiple indications, 12 (6%). Midazolam was used in 18 PS cases (10%). Six (55%) of 11 patients with dyspnea received midazolam for PS, compared with 12 (7%) of 175 patients with other indications for PS (p < 0.001). Forty-three (23%) of 186 PS patients were discharged alive, compared with 812 (80%) of 1,021 patients who did not receive PS (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PS was required in 15% of PCU admissions, and 23% of PS patients were discharged alive. Our findings suggest a potential for significant underreporting of overall PS. If our institution's policy on midazolam use for PS were less restrictive, midazolam use might increase. More research is needed to define the optimal agent for inducing rapid, effective, and easily reversible PS.

摘要

背景

在终末期患者中,用于控制难治性症状的姑息性镇静(PS)的报告使用频率存在很大差异。本研究的目的是确定PS的使用频率和结局,并在我们的姑息治疗病房(PCU)制定咪达唑仑用于PS的给药政策后,检查实践模式。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究回顾了2004年和2005年PCU的入院情况以及药房记录,以确定在PCU接受氯丙嗪、劳拉西泮或咪达唑仑进行PS的患者。评估了每位患者的PS指征、使用药物和出院结局数据。

结果

在研究期间,有1207例患者入住PCU。其中,186例(15%)接受了PS;在PCU死亡的352例患者中,143例(41%)接受了PS。接受PS患者的中位年龄为58岁(范围20 - 84岁),106例(57%)为男性。PS最常见的指征是谵妄,153例(82%);呼吸困难,11例(6%);以及多种指征,12例(6%)。18例PS病例(10%)使用了咪达唑仑。11例呼吸困难患者中有6例(55%)接受咪达唑仑进行PS,而175例有其他PS指征的患者中有12例(7%)(p < 0.001)。186例接受PS的患者中有43例(23%)存活出院,而1021例未接受PS的患者中有812例(80%)存活出院(p < 0.001)。

结论

15%的PCU入院患者需要PS,23%接受PS的患者存活出院。我们的研究结果表明,总体PS可能存在严重漏报的情况。如果我们机构关于咪达唑仑用于PS的政策限制较少,咪达唑仑的使用可能会增加。需要更多研究来确定诱导快速、有效且易于逆转的PS的最佳药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验