Oncology Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, 627 Albert Einstein Av., Sao Paulo, 05652-900, Brazil.
Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, USA.
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Jan 4;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0264-2.
Palliative sedation (PS) is an intervention to treat refractory symptoms and to relieve suffering at the end of life. Its prevalence and practice patterns vary widely worldwide. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency, clinical indications and outcomes of PS in advanced cancer patients admitted to our tertiary comprehensive cancer center.
We retrospectively studied the use of PS in advanced cancer patients who died between March 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2014. PS was defined as the use of continuous infusion of midazolam or neuroleptics for refractory symptoms in the end of life. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of our institution (project number 2481-15).
During the study period, 552 cancer patients died at the institution and 374 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Main reason for exclusion was death in the Intensive Care Unit. Among all included patients, 54.2% (n = 203) received PS. Patients who received PS as compared to those not sedated were younger (67.8 vs. 76.4 years-old, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a diagnosis of lung cancer (23% vs. 14%, p = 0.028). The most common indications for sedation were dyspnea (55%) and delirium (19.7%) and the most common drugs used were midazolam (52.7%) or midazolam and a neuroleptic (39.4%). Median initial midazolam infusion rate was 0.75 mg/h (interquartile range - IQR - 0.6-1.5) and final rate was 1.5 mg/h (IQR 0.9-3.0). Patient survival (length of hospital stay from admission to death) of those who had PS was more than the double of those who did not (33.6 days vs 16 days, p < 0.001). The palliative care team was involved in the care of 12% (n = 25) of sedated patients.
PS is a relatively common practice in the end-of-life of cancer patients at our hospital and it is not associated with shortening of hospital stay. Involvement of a dedicated palliative care team is strongly recommended if this procedure is being considered. Further research is needed to identify factors that may affect the frequency and outcomes associated with PS.
缓和性镇静(PS)是一种干预措施,用于治疗难治性症状和缓解生命末期的痛苦。其在全球的流行程度和实践模式差异很大。我们研究的目的是评估我们的三级综合癌症中心收治的晚期癌症患者中 PS 的频率、临床指征和结局。
我们回顾性研究了 2012 年 3 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间在我们机构死亡的晚期癌症患者使用 PS 的情况。PS 被定义为在生命末期使用咪达唑仑或神经阻滞剂持续输注治疗难治性症状。本研究得到了我们机构研究伦理委员会的批准(项目编号 2481-15)。
在研究期间,机构有 552 名癌症患者死亡,374 名符合本研究纳入标准。排除的主要原因是在重症监护病房死亡。在所有纳入的患者中,54.2%(n=203)接受了 PS。与未镇静的患者相比,接受 PS 的患者更年轻(67.8 岁 vs. 76.4 岁,p<0.001),更有可能被诊断为肺癌(23% vs. 14%,p=0.028)。镇静的最常见指征是呼吸困难(55%)和谵妄(19.7%),最常用的药物是咪达唑仑(52.7%)或咪达唑仑和神经阻滞剂(39.4%)。初始咪达唑仑输注率中位数为 0.75mg/h(四分位距-IQR-0.6-1.5),最终输注率为 1.5mg/h(IQR 0.9-3.0)。接受 PS 的患者的住院生存期(从入院到死亡的住院时间)是未接受 PS 的患者的两倍多(33.6 天 vs. 16 天,p<0.001)。姑息治疗团队参与了 12%(n=25)接受镇静治疗的患者的护理。
PS 是我们医院癌症患者生命末期的一种相对常见的做法,它与住院时间的缩短无关。如果考虑进行此操作,强烈建议引入专门的姑息治疗团队。需要进一步研究以确定可能影响 PS 频率和结局的因素。