Kallen Alexander J, Lederman Edith, Balaji Alexandra, Trevino Ingrid, Petersen Emily E, Shoulson Rivka, Saiman Lisa, Horn Evelyn M, Gomberg-Maitland Mardi, Barst Robyn J, Srinivasan Arjun
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;29(4):342-9. doi: 10.1086/529552.
In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was notified of cases of gram-negative bloodstream infection (BSI) occurring among outpatients who received an intravenous formulation of the prostanoid treprostinil. An investigation was conducted to determine rates of prostanoid-associated BSI in this patient population and possible risk factors for infection.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had received intravenous formulations of at least 1 of the 2 approved prostanoids (epoprostenol and treprostinil) from January 1, 2004, through late 2006. Chart reviews were conducted at 2 large centers for pulmonary arterial hypertension, and a survey of infection control practices was conducted at 1 center.
A total of 224 patients were given intravenous prostanoid treatment, corresponding to 146,093 treatment-days during the study period. Overall, there were 0.55 cases of BSI and 0.18 cases of BSI due to gram-negative organisms per 1,000 treatment-days. BSI rates were higher for patients who received intravenous treprostinil than for patients who received intravenous epoprostenol (1.13 vs. 0.42 BSIs per 1,000 treatment-days; P < .001), as were rates of BSI due to gram-negative organisms (0.81 vs. 0.04 BSIs per 1,000 treatment-days; P < .001). Adjusted hazard ratios for all BSIs and for BSIs due to gram-negative organisms were higher among patients given treatment with intravenous treprostinil. The survey identified no significant differences in medication-related infection control practices.
At 2 centers, BSI due to gram-negative pathogens was more common than previously reported and was more frequent among patients given treatment with intravenous treprostinil than among patients given treatment with intravenous epoprostenol. Whether similar results would be found at other centers for pulmonary arterial hypertension warrants further investigation. This investigation underscores the importance of surveillance and evaluation of healthcare-related adverse events in patients given treatment primarily as outpatients.
2006年9月,美国疾病控制与预防中心收到通知,在接受静脉注射前列环素类药物曲前列尼尔的门诊患者中发生了革兰氏阴性菌血流感染(BSI)病例。开展了一项调查,以确定该患者群体中与前列环素相关的BSI发生率以及可能的感染危险因素。
我们对2004年1月1日至2006年末接受过2种已批准的前列环素类药物(依前列醇和曲前列尼尔)中至少1种静脉制剂的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在2个大型肺动脉高压中心进行了病历审查,并在1个中心开展了感染控制措施调查。
共有224例患者接受了静脉前列环素治疗,在研究期间相当于146,093个治疗日。总体而言,每1000个治疗日有0.55例BSI,革兰氏阴性菌导致的BSI为每1000个治疗日0.18例。接受静脉注射曲前列尼尔的患者的BSI发生率高于接受静脉注射依前列醇的患者(每1000个治疗日分别为1.13例和0.42例;P <.001),革兰氏阴性菌导致的BSI发生率也是如此(每1000个治疗日分别为0.81例和0.04例;P <.001)。接受静脉注射曲前列尼尔治疗的患者中,所有BSI以及革兰氏阴性菌导致的BSI的校正风险比更高。调查发现与用药相关的感染控制措施无显著差异。
在2个中心,革兰氏阴性病原体导致的BSI比先前报告的更为常见,接受静脉注射曲前列尼尔治疗的患者比接受静脉注射依前列醇治疗的患者更频繁发生。在其他肺动脉高压中心是否会发现类似结果值得进一步研究。这项调查强调了对主要作为门诊患者接受治疗的患者进行医疗相关不良事件监测和评估的重要性。