Merwin J R, Newman W, Beall L D, Tucker A, Madri J
Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Am J Pathol. 1991 Jan;138(1):37-51.
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) and beta 2 (TGF-beta 2) are equipotent in many cell systems studies thus far. Recent data, however, show different effects elicited by these two growth factors in specific biologic systems. This investigation compares the effects of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs), rat epididymal fat pad microvascular endothelium (RFCs), and bovine aortic smooth muscle cells (BASCs). In two-dimensional cultures, proliferation of BAECs, BASMCs, and RFCs were all inhibited by TGF-beta 1, while in response to TGF-beta 2, BASMCs were fully inhibited, RFCs were modestly inhibited, and BAECs were unaffected. Bovine aortic endothelial cell migration was significantly inhibited by TGF-beta 1, but only slightly inhibited by TGF-beta 2. In contrast, BASMC migration was enhanced by TGF-beta 1 and was not affected by TGF-beta 2. In three-dimensional cultures, RFCs were stimulated to undergo in vitro angiogenesis in response to TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 at 10-fold higher concentrations. Three distinct receptor assays demonstrated the presence of type I and type II TGF-beta 1 cell-surface-binding proteins on BAECs, BASMCs, and RFCs. Labeled TGF-beta 1 was competed off completely with 100-fold molar excess unlabeled TGF-beta 1, but only partially with equivalent excess unlabeled TGF-beta 2. Furthermore the ratios of type I to type II TGF-beta receptors in these three vascular cell types vary from 1:1 in BAECs to 1.5:1 in RFCs to 3:1 in BASMCs and can be correlated with the differences noted in cellular responses to TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 in proliferation, migration, and in vitro angiogenic assays. These findings support the hypothesis that there are different responses to the TGF-beta s, depending on the cell type and experimental conditions as well as the TGF-beta concentration and isoform used.
转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1)和β2(TGF-β2)在迄今为止的许多细胞系统研究中具有同等效力。然而,最近的数据显示,这两种生长因子在特定生物系统中会引发不同的效应。本研究比较了TGF-β1和TGF-β2对牛主动脉内皮细胞(BAEC)、大鼠附睾脂肪垫微血管内皮细胞(RFC)和牛主动脉平滑肌细胞(BASC)的影响。在二维培养中,TGF-β1抑制了BAEC、BASMC和RFC的增殖,而对于TGF-β2,BASMC被完全抑制,RFC受到适度抑制,BAEC则不受影响。牛主动脉内皮细胞迁移受到TGF-β1的显著抑制,但仅受到TGF-β2的轻微抑制。相反,TGF-β1增强了BASC迁移,而TGF-β2对其无影响。在三维培养中,RFC在10倍高浓度的TGF-β1和TGF-β2作用下被刺激进行体外血管生成。三种不同的受体检测表明,BAEC、BASMC和RFC上存在I型和II型TGF-β1细胞表面结合蛋白。标记的TGF-β1可被100倍摩尔过量的未标记TGF-β1完全竞争掉,但只能被等量过量的未标记TGF-β2部分竞争掉。此外,这三种血管细胞类型中I型与II型TGF-β受体的比例各不相同,从BAEC中的1:1到RFC中的1.5:1再到BASMC中的3:1,并且与在增殖、迁移和体外血管生成检测中细胞对TGF-β1和TGF-β2反应的差异相关。这些发现支持了这样一种假设,即根据细胞类型、实验条件以及所使用的TGF-β浓度和异构体的不同,可以对TGF-βs产生不同的反应。